The thesis relies on conflating sex and gender. Sex from an evolutionary biology standpoint and gender from a modern sociology standpoint are mutually exclusive. Literally apples to oranges.
The thesis relies on explicitly differentiating sex from gender, because it defends the overwhelming consensus in biology that sex is binary. It doesn’t address gender at all other than to briefly note that some people confuse them.
Except he uses the justification to push his anti trans agenda or he wouldn’t getting to gender at all and you’re deliberately engaging in bad faith because you know this already
No he goes out of his way to being up gender and conflate sex and gender to push his transphobic agenda, like you’re doing right now too. Gender isn’t relevant when discussing gametes but he specifically goes out of his way to conflate gender and sex because he’s a transphobic pushing an agenda. He’s not respected and generally fringe in his field because he uses junk science to push right wing culture war bullshit. And on top of it all an evolutionary biologist is in no way an expert on anything gender related what with gender having nothing to do with evolutionary biology which again doubles down that he and you are pushing a bigot agenda. Fuck off bigot. Gamete differentiation in mammals is not in any way relevant to any discussion on gender, but you know that because you’re here in bad faith to be transphobic. And all this because you right wing chuds are afraid to admit you’re attracted to chicks with dicks.
The historical and scientific record is clear: from the 19th century to the present day, biologists, medical professionals, philosophers of science, and evolutionary theorists have used gamete type as the defining criterion for sex. This document compiles citations from that record, providing a reference point for students, scientists, educators, and anyone interested in understanding what “male” and “female” mean in biological terms.
These citations span more than a century of scientific literature, showing that the gamete-based definition of sex is not a recent invention or a reactionary response, but a longstanding, fundamental biological principle. While sex roles and secondary sex characteristics can vary, the definition of the sexes does not: male and female are reproductive categories rooted in the type of gamete an individual has the function to produce.
So much for those chowderheads who say that, using the gametic definition, neither a pre-puberty human, a postmenopausal woman, or a sterile person can be male or female. If you see this argument, you know you’re dealing with someone who’s intellectually dishonest.
Here’s plenty more people with the credentials of your choice signing a statement affirming the same:
(Because it needs to be said for some particularly dim-witted individuals, the fact that’s it’s hosted on wordpress is immaterial. It’s about who signed the statement)
Fuck’s sake. It is incontestable that this is the scientific consensus. Argue that you want to change it by providing a better framework if you want. Stop lying.
And not that it matters, but I’m a better leftist than you are. Don’t be a shitlib. Do better.
The thesis relies on conflating sex and gender. Sex from an evolutionary biology standpoint and gender from a modern sociology standpoint are mutually exclusive. Literally apples to oranges.
The thesis relies on explicitly differentiating sex from gender, because it defends the overwhelming consensus in biology that sex is binary. It doesn’t address gender at all other than to briefly note that some people confuse them.
Except he uses the justification to push his anti trans agenda or he wouldn’t getting to gender at all and you’re deliberately engaging in bad faith because you know this already
He uses the justification to talk about sex. The paper is limited to talking about sex. If that’s transphobic, then reality is transphobic.
No he goes out of his way to being up gender and conflate sex and gender to push his transphobic agenda, like you’re doing right now too. Gender isn’t relevant when discussing gametes but he specifically goes out of his way to conflate gender and sex because he’s a transphobic pushing an agenda. He’s not respected and generally fringe in his field because he uses junk science to push right wing culture war bullshit. And on top of it all an evolutionary biologist is in no way an expert on anything gender related what with gender having nothing to do with evolutionary biology which again doubles down that he and you are pushing a bigot agenda. Fuck off bigot. Gamete differentiation in mammals is not in any way relevant to any discussion on gender, but you know that because you’re here in bad faith to be transphobic. And all this because you right wing chuds are afraid to admit you’re attracted to chicks with dicks.
Where does that paper conflate sex and gender, exactly? You’re not just making shit up, are you?
And you’re wrong yet again. Here’s another well-respected biologist confirming that author:
https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2025/04/03/colin-wright-gives-a-history-of-the-gametic-definition-of-biological-sex/
Here’s plenty more people with the credentials of your choice signing a statement affirming the same:
https://projectnettie.wordpress.com/
(Because it needs to be said for some particularly dim-witted individuals, the fact that’s it’s hosted on wordpress is immaterial. It’s about who signed the statement)
Fuck’s sake. It is incontestable that this is the scientific consensus. Argue that you want to change it by providing a better framework if you want. Stop lying.
And not that it matters, but I’m a better leftist than you are. Don’t be a shitlib. Do better.