• technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Who is “we”?

      It seems like this is the usual ultra privileged people who violently control society under a fundamentally evil system.

      That’s not me and I doubt it’s you.

    • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Came here to said the same thing. I get what she’s going for but no, there shouldn’t be a bailout at all.

      • drzoidberg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 days ago

        If a government ever needs to bail out a company, that company should be rolled into the government as a utility or service, and its CEO/board should be released with no compensation, and barred from holding similar positions for 10 years.

        The bank bailout, airline bailout, automotive bailout, mortgage bailout, etc., should have all been rolled into the federal government, or been completely shut down. If you run your business so shittily that you cannot function without a government bailout, then that business shouldn’t exist.

        • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          You’re overcomplicating things. There’s no reason for a bailout in an ostensibly capitalist economy, period. I appreciate your comment but bailouts shouldn’t exist at all

          • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            There are legitimate negative economic consequences to letting large enough businesses fail. Nationalizing them with no compensation to their executives is a better plan than golden parachutes or inaction, and it’s easier to do than fully-automated luxury gay space communism.

            • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Nope there aren’t :) Ford, Wall Street, and Perplexity should all fail because… they failed.

              That’s kind of how this whole thing works and the worst kind of PPP youre advocating for is what got us in this shithole in the first place

            • IronBird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              you have found a troll, when someone clearly isnt trying to engage in honest debate your words mean nothing. they are just trying to waste your time and energy for shits and giggles. best to block and move on

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I can feel myself being radicalized in real-time by the shamelessness with which they engineer the system to rob everyone not in their country club.

    And by the video I watched this morning about who Jay Gould was and who Andrew Carnegie REALLY was.

  • ZDL@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 days ago

    If a business fails it fails. Period. No government aid.

    If a business that fails is vital to the economy, it is still not bailed out. It is nationalized and turned into a government service. The people who drove it into failure get nothing (except possibly jail time if there was malfeasance).

    Later, if there is someone who shows evidence of being able to run the business successfully, perhaps hand it off as a crown corporation for a bit to that person.

    But at no point should failed businesses be given government money to keep them alive. That rewards massive failure only.

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    In my lifetime, i’ve bailed out the housing market, the auto industry, the airline industry, and probably something else they hid from the media.

    I refuse to help bailout these crappy AI companies that just steal from everyone and want to take jobs away from hard working americans.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Unfortunately it’s not your choice to make. A guy who couldn’t manage to run a casino, literally an infinite money hack, is running the show. I wouldn’t put much faith in him if I were you.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oh its better than that.

        The casino was being run brilliantly.

        by his wife

        and in his petty, infinite jealousy, he kicked her out, and ran the casino… as you said, an infinite money printer, into the ground… because he couldnt stand his wife being successful.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      don’t forget trillion dollar wall street bailout, or the multi trillion dollar covid bailout.

      or the ppp loans which went to republican allies who didnt need them, used them for anything but paycheck protections, and never paid them back, which is a bailout in everything but name.

  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Remember that these CEO’s are the ones (along with their pay-for talking heads in the media) that will, with the zeal and energy of a pentecostal minister on crack, tell us all that socialism will destroy innovation, reward the lazy, and put a bigger burden on the middle class tax payer. All while doing everything their bank accounts can do to build a system where they get more and more of our tax money - because of reasons.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 days ago

    I still don’t (figuratively) understand why the government has to subsidise a capitalistic system. Risk is a part of it, so why not embrace it? Is it because they’re too rich to fail? Why is that reserved for the poors?

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      because all that talk of “risk” and “effort” is propaganda.

      they’re just making up excuses to why they are on top and why we should stay at the bottom. they actually take no appreciable risk, while we have to if we want to make a real investment.

    • Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      At the very least the government should then own part of the companies they bail out. If they are so essential and unable to stay afloat on their own…

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Because they are “too big to fail” because we have lack of regulation allowing for monopolies controlling vital infrastructure and aspects of society and government.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      They have the money to be able to change the rules and the lack of morality to be willing to change them.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      To put it simply, because it’s too big that the economy of the country is depend on it. If the company failed, massive amount of mid/high income people would lose their job, and this will affect the country’s economy so badly it could potentially crash it. That’s why country constantly bail out big company, its to protect basically everyone. Except when other country bailing out a company they nationalised it in some way.

      When the rich say trickle down economy, this is the stuff that is being trickle down, not the good stuff that benefits everyone.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Which is exactly why you stop letting monopolies and duopolies pop up left and right, because they centralize risk and take down your country’s economy with them.

        Risk is better spread out across the economy by having lots of small players taking small risks and either making a payday from them, or not.

        • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yep. When i look at big corporate, everyone want to be the biggest player in the country, yet every economist know in their heart it’s the micro, small and medium enterprise that really matter for the country. A lot of example in american small town, where the giant corporate come in and destroy the small business, then left the town when it’s no longer profitable. Everyone left unhappy other than the executives.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    AIPAC/Billionaires donor keep her and BERNIE and by extension crockett from gaining any significant influence in the party.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      the party is losing it’s grasp fast

      the GOP is dead, replaced by a cult. all those “moderate” republicans of old vote establishment dem or don’t vote at all the DSA has been making great strides taking dem seats covertly, along with open progressives taking seats openly. i could honestly see the democratic party of olde dying entirely next year, if there’s enough votes overall to force internal leadership changes and usurp the democratic pocketbook.

      this is of course mostly copium on my part, if the tides looks like it’ll turn the other way towards a nazi americs…i’m gtfo asap

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        the only reason AOC is even there , is to get people voting for the old guard dems, more or less the dem version of boebart and mtg.

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          like i said, copium on my part. i’v already given up on the US, and am leaving for saner waters asap…

          saw ICE kindap someone off the street a couple months back and it really messed me up completely powerless to do anything while the mainstream and liberals were jerking each other off with these no kings rallys in the cities, the gestapo was raiding surrounding poor neighborhoods and while i briefly entertained the idea of trying to fix shit from within…why waste my time trying to fix something that doesn’t want to be fixed?

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      exactly what i was thinking. no one will stop a possible bailout except the us people.

      and the us people doesn’t seem interested in this effort.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Stop bailing out corporations. “Free market “ means fail and imprisonment of everyone who is committing white collar crimes including politicians and billionaires

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I demand my economy be based on the ability of computers to generate images of comically obese men farting on each other!

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Don’t worry, it won’t be “entertained”, it will simply be done

    And then the bailout money won’t go to saving these shiny turd companies, it’ll all go to the CEOs and founders and that’s about it