• 1.03K Posts
  • 411 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 10th, 2025

help-circle














  • Just stumbled upon this report stating that China is reducing incentives for academics to submit papers to international journals over leak concerns, national security issue,

    The national security concerns have become a new factor in Beijing’s long-running campaign … China’s Ministry of State Security last month accused a researcher of leaking “important technical details” while trying to win acceptance of papers by international journals and academic conferences …

    China’s science policy has been shifting from emphasis on global collaboration and publication in international journals towards tighter controls on how knowledge is shared overseas. The change comes amid geopolitical tensions and the country’s rapid technological advance …

    China’s security ministry in June warned that submissions to international conferences, publications in foreign journals, cross-border academic exchanges and overseas collaborative research must all “strictly” follow the requirements of “review before public disclosure” and “approval before external release” …

    One Chinese scholar in materials science said he had stopped submitting research to foreign journals because it had become “difficult” to pass security reviews, which he said were “unclear and insufficiently objective” and part of a process that discouraged overseas publication … [Here is an archived version of the article.]

    So, again it is primarily China where knowledge is not free. Your argumentation in this thread can only be interpreted as an attempt to distract from illegal Chinese activities. Nothing what China does is about free knowledge, let alone for the benefit ‘of all of mankind,’ It’s rather the exact opposite.

    @TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca























  • Your remarks are false and misleading.

    China maintains army support bases not only in Cambodia but also in Djibouti and Tajikistan.

    It is also noteworthy that China pursues a dual-track strategy across the Indo-Pacific, escalating military and diplomatic pressure on some countries (of late particularly on Taiwan, Japan, and the Philippines) while deepening economic ties with other Asian countries, although these economic partnerships benefit often exclusively China.

    In addition, China’s activities in the Indo-Pacific has been growing in recent years with the most recent warning coming from New Zealand’s intelligence service over Chinese military forays in the Pacific,

    “We anticipate that Chinese actions, such as the PLA-N [China’s People’s Liberation Army navy] task group that transited the Tasman Sea in February and China’s launch of an inter-continental ballistic missile into the Pacific in September 2024, will be a persistent feature of our strategic environment.”

    We must also note that China has increased its military spending from 700 billion dollars in the 1990s to almost 3 trillion dollars in 2025, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. It is by far the largest military spending increase during peace time.



  • This article is a good example of how China’s propaganda works. As one recent investigation has found,

    China’s goal [of its propaganda operations] is to build a positive image of itself. Freedom House describes this as a long-term strategy aimed at “telling China’s story well”. At its core is the image of China as a successful, trustworthy and indispensable partner.

    Oh, and the article is referencing to the U.S.-China Business Council, a researcher at Renmin University of China in Beijing, and Zhu Min, a Chinese economist and former deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund who also held senior positions at the Bank of China and the People’s Bank of China.

    Such articles are pure propaganda.


  • This article is a good example of how China’s propaganda works. As one recent investigation has found,

    China’s goal [of its propaganda operations] is to build a positive image of itself. Freedom House describes this as a long-term strategy aimed at “telling China’s story well”. At its core is the image of China as a successful, trustworthy and indispensable partner.

    Oh, and the article is referencing to the U.S.-China Business Council, a researcher at Renmin University of China in Beijing, and Zhu Min, a Chinese economist and former deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund who also held senior positions at the Bank of China and the People’s Bank of China.

    Such articles are pure propaganda.