Start chopping them down, or destroying them by some means

If you don’t already have the requisite equipment, be sure to leave the local area to purchase it, pay cash, and obscure your face (also make sure that they can’t track you to the store specifically, use a flock map, a bike might be more prudent than a car depending on the scenario.

idk which hand you’d fill first doing that method, lmao

It’s basically just a crass way to say “wishing is for suckers”

Because it didn’t go rogue

If they didn’t intentionally make the model appear to “go rogue”, then it just happened because they’re fucking idiots.

This story has nothing to do with the “great power”™ of AI, it has everything to do with the ineptitude of the employees of Open AI

It’s not true that it “went rogue”

It was instructed to do a task and then left alone for days

It doesn’t know how to do things, so it just starts trying shit from its training

Something like this happening is literally inevitable with those parameters

It’s irresponsibility on the part of the user tho, the machine did not “go rogue” it was trying to do exactly what it was told to do

Why am I at work right now instead of defrauding rich dumbfucks?

Or “don’t count on it” (because if you did you’d be counting for eternity)

I’m sure there’s more I’m not thinking of right now…

“Why don’t you wish in one hand and shit in the other, and see which one fills up first”

… yeah, I like the chair one

Perhaps a Dali would be prudent for this dystopian hellscape

There’s likely a place online where you could have a custom case manufactured.

You could choose the artwork and know that it’s not AI

I think RedBubble offers them (you could also choose another human artist if you don’t want to create your own. Most of the designs on there can go on a phone case.

Sanders is just a confused old man.

His approach would be correct if AI was actually what the techno fascists say it is

It’s basically just like a version of Smarter Child that gets shit wrong all the time tho

The distinction is that computer hardware and simple programs are often well designed.

They also don’t get constantly anthropomorphized because they actually serve a function and can do the things they are advertised as being able to do.

AI is not well designed, and can not do the things it is advertised as being able to do. That’s precisely why they have to lie and make up stories about how scary and spooky it is.

Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of computers ain’t shook

Oh shit, I didn’t even realize Mapquest was still in the game

Thanks for the recommendation, I’ll look into that one

I think this is another intentional misrepresentation by the LLM mongers.

LLMs are not intelligent. They cannot do things that they have not been trained to do.

“Collusion” implies that the alleged agents acted with intention, that is not something an LLM is capable of. They are just using semantic trickery.

They’ve also ruined Google Maps by attempting to “optimize” it with AI

I use a navigation app constantly for work.

A month or two ago Google Maps started doing this thing where it would take me to the incorrect address on the same street as the address I was actually looking for.

Yesterday I put in an address, and it named the destination pin the correct address, but the pin wasn’t even on the same side of the city as the street I knew I was going to.

It used to work flawlessly. What the fuck are they thinking?

Anyway, I deleted that shit. Using Apple Maps until I find a FOSS navigation app I like.

deleted by creator

The just desserts might be served after the bailout

Little filter sounds preferable to the big filter

People dying because they blindly followed the advice of an LLM is kind of like natural selection.

I assume the selection will become more rapid as the consequences of cognitive offloading begin to manifest.

It’s not possible the way they’re trying to do it, no question.

You could make a flimsy argument that it would be possible in some way, but the way that they’ve chosen to approach it is 100% not viable.

To be clear, they did the Test at the same distance.

They didn’t mention the tumbling thing, but I assume that’s just because it’s a higher level concept than the demographic the video was designed for would be familiar with. (I don’t really have any knowledge on that aspect myself, not trying to say I do).

As far as where the bullet hit, I’m going just off of the video and official narrative. In the video it looks like he’s having a fencing response, which would indicate that he was hit with force and not just glanced/grazed.

In the official narrative they claim that the bullet got lodged in one of his vertebrae and stopped because his neck was “abnormally resilient”, or because “that’s what god wanted” depending on who you ask.