cm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 4 months agoSqueeky cleanlemmy.mlimagemessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up13
arrow-up13imageSqueeky cleanlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square21linkfedilink
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoWould you rather they kept it? This is frankly baffling. Nobody is saying this should be the only thing to be done. Just that it’s a good thing. Is it not a good thing?
minus-squareRoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoIf everything from my house was stolen but I was given a tiny useless token back, no, no that isn’t better than getting nothing at all.
minus-squareAceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoIf it avoids them suffering consequences for the original theft, thus leading them to the same con again and again and again because they always win from it, it’s actually a bad thing.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoI’m not saying it’s not a good thing, I’m implying how much of a good thing it is.
minus-squareskye@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoWould you rather not get anything because it’s not good enough?? you’re literally letting perfect be in the way of good
Would you rather they kept it?
This is frankly baffling. Nobody is saying this should be the only thing to be done. Just that it’s a good thing. Is it not a good thing?
If everything from my house was stolen but I was given a tiny useless token back, no, no that isn’t better than getting nothing at all.
If it avoids them suffering consequences for the original theft, thus leading them to the same con again and again and again because they always win from it, it’s actually a bad thing.
I’m not saying it’s not a good thing, I’m implying how much of a good thing it is.
Would you rather not get anything because it’s not good enough?? you’re literally letting perfect be in the way of good