• Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          That’s kinda what I was thinking more so someone put there too downplay any actual thought about ai images that may come out in the future vs the real ones

          • jve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Its hard to argue with ai slop.

            Idk if this is a bot or just some guy using ChatGPT manually, but I’d bet a few sats that’s an ai response.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        user is openly supporting pedophiles and criminals by spreading misinformation.

        user is a huge piece of shit for openly supporting pedophiles and spreading misinformation.

        I don’t see the problem here.

        • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Where are they supporting them?

          Was user meant to be auto filled with their name?

          Did the prompt not work right?

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            34 minutes ago

            when you share content to the public with little to no context it will be misconstrued and reshared as “evidence”.

            what happens when there is a bunch of falsified or unverifiable “evidence” about a particular crime? all evidence comes into question.

            why would that happen? because the defense will always attempt to discredit the claims against them and weaken the actual evidence.

            if this miraculously goes to trial, the first argument the defense attorney will make is, “how can any of this ‘evidence’ be trusted if there’s so much of it that can easily be faked by the general public? how can we be assured that the accused isn’t being targeted by their political opponents and slandered?”

            so, by posting and refusing to provide context of the joke and refusing to remove the fake image, they are supporting pedophiles and spreading misinformation.

            edit: downvote all you want, you know I’m right.