• BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Damn, if only there was a way to allow your source code to be forked and allow other devs opportunities to help contribute code. /s

        • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago
          1. Any dev can fork it and do the work themselves Edit: Project is licenced to disallow forks (but that wouldn’t stop the community from supporting linux builds, see my comment further down the chain)
          2. Community forks can exacerbate rather than fix the problem, see the Fedora OBS fiasco (link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJJvq3dpylM)
          • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I don’t know if you missed the comment referring to it, but the dev deliberately changed the license to his source code to prevent forks, so I was being sarcastic, and the dev is indeed being a stupid dipshit suffering from the consequences of their own actions.

            • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              the dev deliberately changed the license to his source code to prevent forks

              The licence is a creative commons licence and hasn’t been changed in 11 months.

              I’m not sure what you’re talking about

                • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Looks like you can’t distribute a modified version of the project (e.g. a fork), but it wouldn’t stop anyone contributing to or distributing a separate project that users could run locally to patch duckstation’s build process where they can now build it on and for their own machines.

                  A build patch wouldn’t contain any copyrighted material, so anyone could contribute and distribute it.

                  Ironic considering that’s how many emulator get around legal issues. Emulators distribute virtual machines, but they don’t distribute the copyrighted material.