So buy the women’s clothes with pockets. Or get them tailor made or learn to sew them yourself. Or wear the less flattering options that have pockets. The world doesn’t owe you the specific clothes you want and there is no grand conspiracy to keep women from having the size of pockets a few would prefer. Seriously, do you consider everything that doesn’t cater to you a conspiracy against women? I’m so sick of hearing the whining outrage over very trivial shit as if it has any importance at all.
But seriously, if I take what you’re saying at face value that this is a practical problem, large trousers and a belt will give you trousers that cover your legs and don’t fall down.
What I suspect you want is trousers that not only fulfill your functional requirements but which you also think look good. And that is not even an unreasonable desire, but it is clearly a different desire, and one which I don’t think is problem that needs urgently addressing on a societal level. The fact that there is a tradeoff between
deleted by creator
So buy the women’s clothes with pockets. Or get them tailor made or learn to sew them yourself. Or wear the less flattering options that have pockets. The world doesn’t owe you the specific clothes you want and there is no grand conspiracy to keep women from having the size of pockets a few would prefer. Seriously, do you consider everything that doesn’t cater to you a conspiracy against women? I’m so sick of hearing the whining outrage over very trivial shit as if it has any importance at all.
deleted by creator
Women complaining about trivial shit as if it’s some systemic gender oppression, undermining the importance of the entire notion of gender oppression.
Women, amirite?
/s
Men’s pants are sold by leg length and waist size, you can get a pair that are long enough for you and large enough for your hips.
deleted by creator
My ex, a woman, complete with a woman’s hips, pretty much exclusively wore men’s trousers. Sometimes with a belt.
deleted by creator
And men too!
But seriously, if I take what you’re saying at face value that this is a practical problem, large trousers and a belt will give you trousers that cover your legs and don’t fall down.
What I suspect you want is trousers that not only fulfill your functional requirements but which you also think look good. And that is not even an unreasonable desire, but it is clearly a different desire, and one which I don’t think is problem that needs urgently addressing on a societal level. The fact that there is a tradeoff between
is at the level of annoying.
deleted by creator
That’s the space for the pockets to carry things.
deleted by creator
You don’t understand how waists and hips work for women.