Have you guys also noticed this? I’m not talking about “Oh my family isn’t privacy conscious” I honestly get that for ur average moms and pops, they don’t know any better.

the problem is with how these big tech companies effectively poisoned the everyday Joe to think that handing over ur data like a good boy is the norm and breaking out is “weird” and “too much”, this blame also goes on Hollywood.

Yesterday my friend called me " Mr robot" for just taking my privacy seriously I thought it was funny.

some people also fired their single neuron and told me “People only do this when they have something to hide”

These remarks that I face from time to time really highlights the mentality of the general society where if you break out of the norm, even if it doesn’t harm them, they would find a way to make off handed remarks about it almost like they’re dissatisfied that you’re fighting.

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    5 days ago

    I always gotta love the “why do you refuse the cookies? The site might not work!”.

    Sweety I need you to understand that I do not care whether or not the site works. If it doesn’t then it’s not worth my time.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Same issue with DNA tests. I tried to choose not to hand over my DNA so freely but my sister already did it. I didn’t get a choice in the matter.

  • posturemaxxing@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 days ago

    “i have nothing to hide anyways”

    “theyre tracking me anyways so it doesnt matter”

    “i dont do anything illegal so i dont care if im being tracked”

    these quotes make my blood boil

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve also heard

      “I’m not important enough for anyone to care what I’m doing.”

      I’m like honey this shit is automated at population scale. You don’t have to be important. You only have to be a human.

      • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’ve recently realized that people have no idea how algorithms work. It’s also eye-opening when you realize how poorly educated many people are and how bad the literacy rates are.

        I’ve tried as hard as I can to help people around me. They just don’t get it. I’ve provided alternatives and told them they fund fascism when giving info away. I’ve been trying to help the “I have nothing to hide” club for 15 years now. It’s just no use. I have failed to convince a single person.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.

    - Edward Snowden

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      But that doesn’t give individuals a reason to take action on there own privacy. At least it should mean others will respect you more for valuing your own privacy.

  • Justifier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 days ago

    I just go full anti tech, which people find ironic since I’m in the tech industry, and they poke fun at that

    No matter what you do, no matter what you think or say, people will try their darnedest to poke holes at it

    But what you *don’t * do? That’s pretty hard to poke holes at.

    “I don’t have a Facebook account” is a brickwall to the conversion. That way in their mind, it’s not that I don’t trust the company, it’s that I don’t even slightly value the product. I have a damn phone, I have to am required to_ pay for the damn phone. It has group chats. What is the value of Facebook again?

    Marketplace? I buy everything brand new and keep it until it’s dead

    Doomscrolling? Bad habit, not interested

    Family connections? I cut most of them off but maybe 4, who know to call/text

    Now even thermostats are getting microphones and listening devices, which will absolutely be used to collect data on people from their homes see ecobees new TOS, and the new HoneyWell/ring camera integrations frankly I’m just done with the bullshit. I’m full blown get any phone home technology the fuck out of my house levels of done

    But I don’t say that when people ask why I changed my thermostat from the $400 Ecobee, which was a standout feature in my home when they walked in.

    No. I say “their servers kept going down and causing issues when I needed it to work”, because people who somehow manage to live without concerning themselves of targeted pricing or snooping practices do care about slight inconveniences, and for whatever reason “they changed their TOS to get people to agree to let them spy on them without legal reprecussions, and if you don’t agree they’ll lock you out of your account barring you from using half the stuff you paid to use” is less logical to their pre-occupied brains than “I got inconvenienced twice a year from down servers”

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      I just go full anti tech, which people find ironic since I’m in the tech industry, and they poke fun at that

      It’s funny, because they’ve managed to draw completely the wrong conclusion. You aren’t anti-tech despite working in the tech industry, no - you’re anti-tech because of working in the tech industry.

  • I don’t talk about privacy with normies. If they bring it up, I’m happy to discuss.

    I think privacy is very slowly becoming more mainstream and a large part of that is thanks to google. Installing “ai” on devices, deleting peoples’ accounts, making installing non-play store apps more difficult, will ultimately encourage more people to degoogle their lives.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s interesting working in the field as a non technical. We talk all day about data security but my homelab has more observability than half the enterprises I speak with. And they all know. And they never have the budget.

      It’s literally the first scene of fight club all day erryday in infosec. If the cost of the recall is less than the prevention, not worth it to them.

    • Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yeah. no. “Normies” love AI everything. They definitely don’t install apps from outside the Play store either.

      Only thing that bugs them from this list is the deletion of accounts. Unfortunately they’ll happily hand over ID and other things to get it back, or just create a new account on the same site.

      Source: Experience.

    • OppressedBread@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      Idk why tf they’re so hell bent on AI, I get that they need a return on their shitty investments but my god the level of detachment from the general public is insane

      • novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        Because AIs don’t need salaries, don’t unionize, can work 24/7.

        For some tasks, AI has already completely obsoleted humans. An AI can write a shitty PR filled newsletter faster and cheaper than a human. It keeps getting better at certain tasks, like programming.

        All AI companies want to be the one that controls the best AI. Because if they do, then other companies will pay them to rent out AIs for cheaper than human labor.

        Companies fear falling behind. So they dump loads of money into AI. And currently, investors like hearing about AI. So the more companies say and push AI, it increases investment into the company.

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          It’s way more insidious. “AI” is very much LLMs, or Large language Models. The one thing they excel at is ingesting large amounts of text and summarizing, or looking for key points, as directed, and sometimes with non-exact directions.

          Large amounts of text, like your browsing history, your personal cloud-stored files, your chats and messages your email. Your taxes. Your bank records. Your not-yet filed patents. Your medical research. Your political donations. Your protest plans. Your sources for the journalism you are doing.

          At scale, society-wide. Zoom back and predict the markets overall sentiment. Zoom in down to a single “undesirable”.

          All that “it’ll do human creative jobs you have to pay so much for, and if you reduce headcount you’ll get a nice bonus” is for all the short-thinking middle management and vapid C-levels to get suckered by the Mechanical Turk show into think they’ll get a bonus this quarter by putting all their sensitive information on someone else’s computer.

          And once their IT staff is minimized and hardware is out of reach, you have achieved vendor lock-in.

          And it’s absolutely incredible how literally everyone seems to have fallen for this shiny turd.

          I mean cmon, “Palantir”? They were literally created for this purpose.

      • ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        If you happen to want to know more on why, there are 2 podcasts that talk about this on a very regular basis:

        • Deep Questions with Cal Newport - super chill guy that every week has an episode on ai reality check. Usually explains quite at length why something is happening on ai why is factual or not
        • Better offline - Ed can be quite opinionated and sometimes borderline ranty, but he also tends to breakdown stuff like financial numbers on ai investment and why (or why not) you should break those down.
        • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I think thatsa great description of Zitron. His efitorial style initially turned me off but he is thorough and shows his sources for the factual sides of his arguments.

      • Yeah, I don’t get it either. I read that only 3% of companies using “ai” saw a return on investment. Companies started re-hiring the humans because the “ai” turns out to be shit. We can’t even produce the power to run these models at scale.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            they are. they need people to be as dependent on it as possible so they can then push for ransom.

            even then, no way they can get their trillion dollar investment back like this, they are probably just trying to push the pop further as long as they possibly can while maneuvering to be on top when it all comes down.

  • Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    Whenever I hear the “only people with something to hide” comment I reply “oh? Then unlock your phone, hand it to me and leave the room.” They always backtrack immediately.

  • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    It’s scary to think about how the next generations are essentially being groomed to believe that these invasive applications and surveillance are just normal. But that’s the goal of the big tech oligarchs.

    Same reason they try and say it’s only criminals that want to protect their privacy.

    • OppressedBread@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      that’s what I’m saying,surveillance is the new normal, its trendy, opposition is being an “Extremist” and “Creepy”

  • 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    The really creepy one is stuff like 23andme where your genealogy obsessed extended family all does it and now they can statistically estimate your genome from your known family history and it’s all in a database for sale and Trump’s DOJ is likely buying

  • That’s par for the course my friend. But the response to these cliché statements is what can start to change perspectives! I like highlighting how Big Tech knows them better than they know themselves. Then get into how this means big tech has the ability to change how they view a topic based the specific search results. I then zoom out and explain how this happens for every user similar to them, as well as for every other “group” big tech classifies people under.

    I often get something like “But what can we even do about it then?” in response, which more often than not, eventually leads to them admitting they’re lazy and things are too convient to switch away from or stop using lol

    • brave_lemmywinks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      I usually point out that they were the ones saying that their phones are listening to them and making changes to their instagram\shopping algorithm.

  • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think people reject that it’s as bad as they’re told because that don’t like to believe it’s that bad, or that there’s no way companies would do that to them. People don’t accept being told “you’re making a big mistake” and to feel dumb about it.

    That’s my take. I had somebody at work ask what I do regarding privacy and I realized I lit up with excitement to share and had to immediately dial it back to not freak them out. I started out small and simple and emailed them since basics after chatting. Said, if they wanted additional info let me know " so that it’s up to them to continue the journey (down the rabbit hole lol).

    But just glad to see others gaining the knowledge. My journey wasn’t immediate, it’s gradual, so I have to be mindful of their process too.

  • ugo@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ask people that tell you that only those with something to hide care about privacy whether they shit with the door open or closed when there are others around.

  • Menschlicher_Fehler@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    I knew a guy once who would upload party photos to Facebook and other sites, tagging the people in it. Did that with passed out and way too drunk people too. That was my call to never party with him… and to maybe drink less over all.

  • magnue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yeah if I talk about how everything is routed through VPN people just assume I’m deep into porn or worse.

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well, there’s a new War On VPNs starting (ugh). If the Forces of Enshittification prevail, we could see them banned in more countries. And not just the usual suspects either. The idea is being pushed in several US states, in the UK, and maybe(?) the Aussies? It’s being fought in all those ofc. But I’m afraid the political momentum for bans will build and build.

      My hope is, that Canada will be chill and not follow the rest of us off a cliff. Come on, Canada! You’re our best hope!

      • magnue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t see how they ban it though. I could surely just buy a VPS somewhere where it is allowed and then route through a VPN from there?

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I could surely just buy a VPS somewhere where it is allowed and then route through a VPN from there?

          That would also be significantly less private than using a public VPN. This method would only prevent your ISP from seeing what you do, but if someone figures out the public ip of your VPS and connects it to your identity, then you’re just as exposed as when not using a VPN at all. The big advantage of public VPNs is that you share a public IP with dozens or hundreds of other users on the same server.

          Using Tor would be the better option for privacy, but comes with its own issues. Also, please don’t abuse the tor network for piracy

        • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Well they have ways to make it very hard. China, Russia, and some other countries already block VPNs. Sure it’s not 100% ironclad. But it doesn’t have to be. They want to block the big majority. If 1% finds a way around, it was still effective.

          There are technical ways, like DPI based blocking of the protocols. There are ways to bypass that, sure, but you lost most ppl already.

          Then there are social ways. Make the risk too high if you’re caught. Ppl will be afraid to try.

          I do not think the US, EU, Aus are close to that extreme yet. Not tryin to say this is right around the corner. But other countries already have done these things. It is possible we could see those measures in the future.