Dual-use research that leads to applications for both civilian and military or security purposes is geographically widespread and more scientifically influential than is research that has strictly civilian applications.
An analysis of data from bibliometric databases and US patent records found that 14% of 600,000 scientific papers published between 1981 and 2005 originated from dual-use research projects (see ‘Dual-use attracts attention’). The study also found that dual-use research publications are cited more than their non-dual-use research counterparts.
Kinda reminds me of a brief disagreement. The article does say that this may be “vastly overestimating the amount of dual-use research”, because “we don’t know what the national security concerns are that caused an application to be flagged. That is the definition may be too vague.