(No provocation)

I see these reasons:

  • newbie
  • lazy (don’t wanna edit config files etc.)
  • unique features (like assistant/toolbox, some optimizations like in cachyos)
  • wanna check how different systems are set up (that’s rather distrohopping)

Personally, I used manjaro i3 when I was beigginer and wanted to see how tiling WM should be configured (check out ranger config, for example). But after some time, I don’t see reasons why not to just customize pure arch (same with debian and debian-based distros).

  • Lung@lemmy.world
    4·
    12 hours ago

    Last time I installed Arch I just told Codex to build an ISO with my favorite stuff, flashed the physical media, and started using it. Now that’s a one step setup

    • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
      2·
      12 hours ago

      Do you have it detailed somewhere? A blog or something. Would be interesting to see what it looks like.

      • Lung@lemmy.world
        1·
        2 hours ago

        Nah, but it’s an sdcard with arm arch for raspberry pi. It runs wayland/gnome and has full fps to a little display I keep on my desk. I had Codex install various gnome shell plugins to give compiz-y window effects. I even had it set up zram (compressed ram) to optimize the machine. It’s so much easier than when I had to actually read the wiki and type into some keyboard with my meat sticks. Now I can just tell my computer to fix itself and it does. I’ve had it configure and manage kubernetes clusters before, that works great too. Run LLMs as full yolo root my guys