FBI director Kash Patel claimed to US senators that the removal of a bar on hiring people who had engaged in bestiality was aimed at protecting sexual assault survivors.

“Why would you even get into bestiality?” he asked. “We’re not into bestiality,” said Patel.

In a further exchange, Patel explained to Senator John Kennedy, the Louisiana Republican, that previously, regulations had barred anyone who engaged in bestiality “on either side of it.”

“Either side of what, the bestiality?” asked Kennedy. “So you disqualified the animal?”

“We have great canines, but we’re not going to disqualify them,” said Patel.

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    2 days ago

    I don’t believe a functioning FBI wouldn’t be able to make exceptions for agents that would be qualified if not for conditions far outside their control as children.

    The entire point of the article is that there was exactly that limitation and the rules are now coming into line with your prior expectation of how the rules should work.

    From the article:

    multiple individuals have been disqualified from applying for the agency because they were victims of human-trafficking-related bestiality.

    the FBI has had a number of applicants in previous years who suffered sexual abuse in their past, causing questions about prostitution, bestiality, or other similar issues to affect their background check process through zero fault of their own. Previously, those applicants would be barred from consideration. Now they can be considered.

    “Applicants who have engaged in bestiality means they were victims of bestiality because they were forced to do so,” replied Patel. “At this FBI we are not going to criminalize and prevent victims from serving.”

    • Nouvellalia@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      2 days ago

      Why wouldn’t they just add the word “willingly” then? Because that would except the people who were victims without letting in the people Kash really wants in.