• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Bluemaggots say things that help build the argument for my extermination because they’re worthless fucking opportunist cowards that don’t stand for anything. I’m sure, in their heart-of-hearts, they don’t even care about trans issues one way or the other.

    However, that won’t stop them from “reaching across the isle” to vote for it in a big bipartisan compromise to show how reasonable and moderate they are; they’ll trade away my rights for idk canceling up to $20,000 in debt for Pell Grant recipients who open a business in a disadvantaged community and operate it for at least three years. Either we nominate a progressive or I die.

    Every single Democrat that supports any form of gender segregation supports sending me to men’s prison.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Well, I was trying to give you a hope for an out but I guess that’s a no go.

      I’d rather you didn’t kill yourself.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 days ago

          It’s September 29. AFAIK most, if not all, of the primaries are over now. Either you got your ideal candidate or you didn’t, but either way, there’s only one way to keep the guaranteed-to-be-trans-genocidal Republican out of office at this point.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            19 days ago

            I said 2028 in my original comment, didn’t I?

            Also I notice you used “ideal” as if not wanting to be r*ped and murdered in men’s prison is idealistic. That’s the bare fucking minimum. If you nominate a candidate that supports the ideology for my genocide, I’m not sticking around to see how it turns out.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 days ago

              I said 2028 in my original comment, didn’t I?

              IDGAF about your fig-leaf; this thread is about 2026. That one sentence may have mentioned 2028, but don’t try to pretend you weren’t speaking more generally in the rest of your comments.

              Also I notice you used “ideal” as if not wanting to be r*ped and murdered in men’s prison is idealistic.

              Fuck off with putting words in my mouth. I used “ideal” as in “better than the alternative” – WHICH IT IS! – and you know it. You are not fucking entitled to attack me for your own hyperbolic interpretation of some imagined different word that I didn’t say!

              If you nominate a candidate that supports the ideology for my genocide,

              Do you realize that, by being incredibly accusatory and hostile to people who are trying to be your allies, you’re only making the worst outcome for yourself more likely? Don’t blame this shit on me!


              Here’s the real bottom line: even if your 2026 Democratic candidate isn’t pro-trans, some candidates in other jurisdictions are. For there to be any hope of protecting trans people those other pro-trans Democrats need to be able to form a coalition with the rest of the party powerful to stand up against the Republicans. By refusing to vote and denying them that coalition, you are actively harming other trans people. Where’s your motherfucking solidarity, qomrade?!

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 days ago

                  Gender doesn’t excuse being disingenuous. What would you have me do, treat her differently because she’s trans? What are you, sexist?