MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agoMy favorite part of the joblemmy.mlimagemessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up15
arrow-up15imageMy favorite part of the joblemmy.mlMalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square5linkfedilink
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoi think you think that telephone numbers are well-structured. they are not. they are messy. they do not fit a certain schematic. I recommend also the following topic: “people have names”. https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/ Names do not in general fit into the schematic “first name, last name”
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 months agoIs there not a “falsehoods programmers think about phone numbers” yet? Edit: And once again, I’m still confused about some of these. Do we need to expand unicode for names? It’s supposed to be universal. WTF is up with 40?
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-228 days ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
i think you think that telephone numbers are well-structured. they are not. they are messy. they do not fit a certain schematic.
I recommend also the following topic: “people have names”. https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/
Names do not in general fit into the schematic “first name, last name”
Is there not a “falsehoods programmers think about phone numbers” yet?
Edit: And once again, I’m still confused about some of these. Do we need to expand unicode for names? It’s supposed to be universal. WTF is up with 40?
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]