Sorry for horrible title, let me explain

I’m a fairly new commie with some readings, and I’ve been thinking: is communism or at least an advanced socialist society achievable through continuous reform if the State is controlled by the working class? China in my eyes is advancing socialism even with a bourgeois class still owning much of the means of production, so the rule of capital is still in place, with the central socialist government using it to its needs. When I speak to my comrades in my party (UP in Brazil, they’re ML - staunch anti-China “officially” but there are plenty of pro-China inside of the party) the anti-China ones always say there can’t be socialist advancement while the bourgeoisie exist, or while there are market relations.

Anyways, I’m sorry if I was not very clear:

Is the betterment of the working class and a push to communist relations to the means of production possible through gradual means when the working class is in charge of the State and the economy?

  • materialanalysis1938@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    17 days ago

    Communism can only exist globally in a world without scarcity. So while I wholeheartedly accept socialism in one country, I think we have to acknowledge that China isn’t going to reach communism alone.

    I do however think that Marxism is nothing if not constantly adapting or “reforming” to changing material conditions. So if the dictatorship of the proletariat remains, I think this is the only path towards developing socialism