RegularJoe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoGlobal Warming [Photographic Evidence]lemmy.worldimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up1453file-textcross-posted to: antiquememesroadshow@lemmy.world
arrow-up1453imageGlobal Warming [Photographic Evidence]lemmy.worldRegularJoe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square28linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: antiquememesroadshow@lemmy.world
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-21 year ago1720 is likely wrong. Most people women just didn’t wear enclosed underwear until the early 1800s. Before that you went commando. Edit for clarity
minus-squareRegularJoe@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agohttps://www.medievalists.net/2024/06/underwear-middle-ages/
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoThat’s the medieval period and men, primarily. You want to look at the Roccoco period and women. I edited my original comment. But those are mostly loin cloths with tunics tucked into them the OP post shows knee length bloomers with gusset and waistband
![Global Warming [Photographic Evidence]](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2be6082e-452a-4258-85a4-74b229bf4bb4.png){kind=link}
1720 is likely wrong. Most
peoplewomen just didn’t wear enclosed underwear until the early 1800s. Before that you went commando.Edit for clarity
https://www.medievalists.net/2024/06/underwear-middle-ages/
That’s the medieval period and men, primarily. You want to look at the Roccoco period and women. I edited my original comment.
But those are mostly loin cloths with tunics tucked into them the OP post shows knee length bloomers with gusset and waistband