• cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    29 days ago

    I can’t say it’s not, but it does link to the actual paper, which cites a lot of other research and none of it seems to be hallucinations.

    • CrayonDevourer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      The paper itself is proper - I’m still reading over it. But the ‘article’ linked to seems to be an AI summary with no actual substance to be found. It repeats itself a lot with rewordings of the same generic solid state batteries are better than “liquid batteries” because they’re solid and not liquid.

      I just doesn’t pass the sniff test.