Oh it’s easy. You eat the ones that are bred specifically for food or licensable to hunt - generally herbivores and some omnivores. I know it can be confusing though. The easy way to tell is that if it’s sold at the grocery store or restaurant then it’s almost certainly a food animal. If the store also sells pets then you can always ask the staff, though live animals are generally not intended for human consumption.
I’m not even commenting on veganism. Basing any moral framework off of whatever the law currently is a bad take. Laws should be based off of morals, not the other way around. Slavery was legal, but that doesn’t make it moral.
Oh it’s easy. You eat the ones that are bred specifically for food or licensable to hunt - generally herbivores and some omnivores. I know it can be confusing though. The easy way to tell is that if it’s sold at the grocery store or restaurant then it’s almost certainly a food animal. If the store also sells pets then you can always ask the staff, though live animals are generally not intended for human consumption.
“Laws provide moral order”
All life consumes other life to continue to live. Pretending that being picky about it is more moral is extremely arrogant.
I’m not even commenting on veganism. Basing any moral framework off of whatever the law currently is a bad take. Laws should be based off of morals, not the other way around. Slavery was legal, but that doesn’t make it moral.
There are some people that have morals that should never be laws.
this is bad faith. it is not what they said, it is a strawman.