AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 20 days agothe more things changelemmy.worldimagemessage-square127linkfedilinkarrow-up11.09K
arrow-up11.09Kimagethe more things changelemmy.worldAngryRedHerring@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 20 days agomessage-square127linkfedilink
minus-squarehuppakee@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up38·20 days ago There was no need for usage of lethal force in any of this. They don’t learn when you need lethal force or when you don’t. They learn how you aim a gun and that you have immunity while you are doing your job.
minus-squareBlameTheAntifa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·edit-220 days agoThe executioner was apparently an 8 year veteran.
minus-squareBigPotato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·20 days ago8 year Border Patrol veteran. They’ve always been trash.
minus-squarehuppakee@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·20 days agoThe article gives a lot of information, but all i read about this guy is “… the officer who shot the man had extensive training as a range safety officer and in using less-lethal force.” Which doesn’t undermine my point i suppose
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·20 days agoImmunity from civil litigation or criminal prosecution. 2 very different things.
minus-squaresaimen@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8·20 days agoDidn’t Stephen Miller explicitly wrote “absolute immunity”?
minus-squarepeopleproblems@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·20 days agoMaybe federally. The state has its own ability to prosecute and the federal government can’t do shit about it other than impede investigating.
minus-squareFlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·20 days agoIn theory, they do. Walz appears content to just write sternly-worded social media posts a’la Chuck Schumer.
They don’t learn when you need lethal force or when you don’t. They learn how you aim a gun and that you have immunity while you are doing your job.
The executioner was apparently an 8 year veteran.
8 year Border Patrol veteran. They’ve always been trash.
The article gives a lot of information, but all i read about this guy is “… the officer who shot the man had extensive training as a range safety officer and in using less-lethal force.”
Which doesn’t undermine my point i suppose
Immunity from civil litigation or criminal prosecution.
2 very different things.
Didn’t Stephen Miller explicitly wrote “absolute immunity”?
Maybe federally. The state has its own ability to prosecute and the federal government can’t do shit about it other than impede investigating.
In theory, they do.
Walz appears content to just write sternly-worded social media posts a’la Chuck Schumer.
Do they know that?