

Sigourney Weav’r
Sigourney Weav’r
I mean, the quote gives up the game. That “completely unrelated person” is being given better treatment in exchange for testifying against Mr Abrego. Republicans would rather 2-3 actual criminals be given leniency than this high-profile man further embarrass their illegal, unethical decisions.
deleted by creator
Did I say I didn’t want to change the system? But it’s literally impossible to do if we let these old, entrenched politicians stay in power.
I don’t understand what this comment means. The alternative is to… let them serve until they’re 80-90 years old? We need younger politicians who are personally invested in the future of this country and the planet. And term limits. We need them both.
I’ve tried it, it doesn’t work. It just made my back sore…
That’s actually adorable.
👻
I don’t know… When I was a teenager, Hermione made me Explosio Nocturna.
Everyone watch, he’s about to TACO!
Hamkerders
Dear you,
Me too. Maybe a crepe?
Signed,
Me
This is like boomers signing text messages.
Sincerely,
Empricorn
Your post was about a friend who’s “transracial” (your term), not trans in the sense that they identify as a different gender than the one they were assigned at birth. Plus, you use the term “trans” to refer to that identity like it’s a universally-accepted conclusion and just as accepted as the other use of trans. You also insult those who don’t agree with this, call them transphobic, and accuse anyone who disagrees of brigading (with no evidence). While not personally included in either group, my understanding is that this point of view is very controversial and could be considered offensive to people from one, both, or neither community. Again, no opinion on the content, but I believe that’s part of why it didn’t resonate with people reading it.
TLDR: It’s controversial because it’s controversial.
No shit. Trump pulled us out of the mutually-beneficial nuclear deal that Iran had been abiding by simply because it was brokered by democrats. Ukraine gave up their nukes in exchange for security guarantees from us, the UK and Russia… We all see how well that worked out.
I get what you’re saying, but the “four boxes of liberty” are about freedom. People were free to talk about how bad Trump would be, and they did. The 2024 election was free and fair (until we have proof it wasn’t). Federal courts have struck down many things the Trump administration has attempted. Liberty isn’t inevitable, it has to be fought for. As a country “We the People” failed, not our institutions.
I agree with you that there was voter suppression and gerrymandering but in no way were those insurmountable. We chose all this chaos and lawlessness.
If “Did Not Vote” was a candidate:
The ballot box didn’t fail. People decided they wanted this by either voting Republican or not at all.
No, the other Sigourney that doesn’t exist and no one knows about.