Bitter is actually not good coffee. There are also light and medium roasts which taste less like “dark roast” and let more of the flavor of the beans through, which is more interesting and varied for some people. For instance I’d say what I’m drinking now is bright and citrusy.

What you’re looking for is the history of “computer vision”

Like most things, there isn’t an a/b divide but a spectrum between the two, and in this case it’s even more complicated because a society could take a collectivist view about one thing and an individualist view about others.

Work culture all over the world regardless of culture is fucked up.

🤘

Weird how you say collectivist like it’s a bad thing

Yeah there’s the difference. I’m not convinced there is a robust poison but I’d love to be wrong

You’re completely talking past me. Everyone knew it was a flimsy baracade and that if the LLM companies hadn’t circumvented it they would soon. That doesn’t stop people from continuing to innovate. Publishing the results mean there is a public solution anyone can use.

Do I think it’s the worst thing that could happen? Not really, but your security through obscurity argument makes no sense in this context and it would probably be better if it wasn’t done and published so every bad actor can use it with minimal effort.

This will be a never ending arms race. There isn’t going to be a permanent obstacle, so all this did was help the bad guys move to the next stage.

familiar with the code base

Call me crazy but I think developers should understand what they’re working on, and using LLM tools doesn’t provide a shortcut there.

Of course it can be beaten. All that happened is these university employees did big tech’s work for them and they’re try to spin it like they’re on artist’s side anyway

You’re acting like this is a gotcha when it’s actually probably the most rigorous study of AI tool productivity change to date.

Now, as for AI, it’s currently as good or “better” than about 40% of brand-new fresh from the BS program software engineers I have worked with. A year ago that number probably would have been 20%. So far it’s improving relatively quickly. The question is: will it plateau, or will it improve exponentially?

LOL sure

It is based on my experience, which I trust immeasurably more than rigged “studies” done by the big LLM companies with clear conflict of interest.

The point is that comparing AI tools to junior engineers is ridiculous in the first place. It is simply marketing.

AI tools are way less useful than a junior engineer, and they aren’t an investment that turns into a senior engineer either.

Fun how the article concludes that AI tools are still good anyway, actually.

This AI hype is a sickness

Lol this is ridiculous.

1. Small changes across many people add up. IE meatless Monday has a positive effect even though it’s not full abstinence.
2. If someone truly can’t economically afford to change their eating habits I’m not talking about them. You’re extrapolating to them in order to make a bad faith argument against anyone making any positive change. (Though beans and rice is cheaper than beef lol)
3. Corporate America, while it can’t be controlled exclusively by people’s habits, actually is able to be influenced by enough people’s spending habits. It has to make money after all.

Have fun completely abdicating your agency and making absurd rants though, I guess

P.S. no one argues that people should make personal changes in lieu of government/business changes. This is another bad faith assertion people make to attempt to abdicate personal responsibility.

How dare you ask people to change literally any habit they have! It’s obviously someone else’s responsibility to change!

To reiterate, I don’t think there is anything wrong with using the AUR. I think that using an AUR helper that ties updating AUR packages to your pacman -Syu is a trap that people keep falling into despite the warnings in the wiki.