Obviously it’s the DEI

Their statement is compatible with a profit incentive. Companies were happy to pay to be online because it was good marketing.

It’s just pining for the time before they figured out how to target marketing and sell data

Stupid sexy shrikes

Wouldn’t be the first person to dream of banging a shrike

They built the Dyson sphere to exclusively power grok. The sun no longer licks the earth with its warm light. The land based datacenters on earth, now buried under hundreds of meters of ice, provide the few remaining sources of heat through their exhaust shafts. The last of the surface bound human refugees cling to them as camps and villages pop up here and there. Sustaining themselves on Jensen Huang brand “Hot Dog flavored” meat-like rations, they gather in small villages hobbled together about the exhaust vents. Unable to exhaust enough carbon from their blood they can’t even risk letting their core temp drop. They know atmosphere as well the cold to be their prison wall. There they huddle for warmth, rationing, and waiting for the next hoard of autonomous PolyGPTMarket Enforcement Drones. Waiting to learn whether their agenetic overlords placed enough stake on their survival, or that the day had come - that they might be swept down the shaft, macerated and baked into hot-dog flavored oblivion.

Firing and rehiring at a lower wage. That is, if they’re motivated to continue producing functional products. It’s clear that at this point many aren’t. So maybe this content is moot.

Jefferson park maybe?

Those OSHA guidelines are for gaseous phase. Which yes you’re likely to get a high concentration even just pumping gas, but my guess is it averages out to within the limits. Seems weird to state liquid fractions.

Are you swimming in your fuel?

Ignoring that IQ is a grift and a lie: Sitting within a standard deviation of average intelligence is NOT a bad thing. If intelligence really could be measured it would mean you’re capable of doing anything about as well as anyone else.

Well you’d need a strategy to defeat that mechanism to develop a high standard universal care in the first place. On one hand, that makes the entire argument moot, but on the other hand the same or similar strategy aught to function both for development and maintenance of the system.

Maybe that strategy is widely nuanced in finding an answer to each of the thousands of concerns and organizing for change through protocol. Alternatively there’s revolution and reboot.

It’s simply trust in the organization that maintains the app.

Unless you’re coordination/organizing about legal grey or red areas then it’s not much danger. Meta says it’s E2E but do they really not have access to your data? I don’t believe them. Any data they have would be happily handed over to the authorities just like your protonmail.

Signal just straight up doesn’t have access since it’s all stored at the endpoint and they provide no remote backup.

Yes but if taxes are paying for the system then preventing tax exemption and building a competitive standard of care system heavily disincentivizes use of the private system.