

Since this news is coming from CBS i’d just as likely think it was price-gouging.
Since this news is coming from CBS i’d just as likely think it was price-gouging.
We’re The Middle-Finger Of The South
Solution to what? Being a real place?
Eh, Texas isn’t a real place.
I spent my time fighting AppImages until Canonical started to force Snap on me. I hated Snap so bad it forced me to switch distros. Now I appreciate Flatpak as a result and I don’t find AppImages all that bad, either. Also, I haven’t found myself in dependency-hell nor have I crashed my distro from unofficial Repos in well over a decade.
-It’s a long way of saying It works for me and it’s not Snap.
deleted by creator
Well, some of the GOP ARE Liberals, although, A few are theocrats. Your loss.
I think your username is probably working against you on this one.
Yes, that sounds very much like a Liberal take.
" Punishing farmers (or any industry) rarely punishes those that deserve it"
When did that last happen?
i’m not sure it would make it okay but it might make it ironic.
This is what frustrates me when Liberals start rallying around illegal farm labor and it’s “economic benefits.” -I think if we’re going to have realistic regulations around immigrant labor then the first priority should start with penalizing the farmers (and other employers) that hire the illegal labor because they don’t want to pay a reasonable wage or maintain a safe work-environment
By claiming people must vote for the “lesser evil” and nothing else then the party of “lesser evil” implicitly paves the way for people to stop showing up for them, which to that side paves the way for their greater evil to eventually win. -If you think that’s selfish and entitled, then that’s your prerogative, but if you want people support your candidate then you have to get them to want to support your candidate, be it selfish or not.
No, not voting is simply not voting. More to the point, not voting is “explicitly” saying you don’t care enough to spend the time or energy on casting a vote or you couldn’t vote. A person might think it implicitly* says “either choice is equally good”, but then I could argue that the Democrat party implicitly considers “either choice equally good” because they didn’t attempt to earn the votes.
When it’s easier to not vote than come out to vote, then the responsibility is on the candidates to convince their potential constituents to turn out for them.
“Only the good die young”