1·
17 minutes agounprovoked attack on their energy infrastructure
That’s one way of putting it.
A contrarian isn’t one who always objects - that’s a confirmist of a different sort. A contrarian reasons independently, from the ground up, and resists pressure to conform.
- Naval Ravikant
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
Cake day: January 30th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
1·20 minutes agoI’m still waiting for that ease of mind. I could live 2 years off my savings yet most of my anxiety remains financial.
Who said it was “totally annihilated”?
It’s a tunnel system over 70 meters beneath a mountain. To totally annihilate it, you’d need more GBU-57s than exist in the world - or a nuke.
4·20 hours agoA decent entry-level hardtail.
US Reportedly Assesses It Would Need to Drop Nuclear Bomb to Destroy Iran Nuclear Facility
Well, they did it.
No they didn’t. It was conventional bombs, not nuclear.
0·3 days agoLighter fluid works great as well
There are very few pieces of knowledge that I’d consider a fact. Rather, I tend to see those as the best current knowledge that might turn out to be false in the future. The fact of consciousness is among the only things in the entire universe that I see as absolutely being true. Pretty much anything else can just be an illusion.
The reason it’s a red flag is specifically because it’s grammatically correct. People don’t tend to write like that online. Look at OP, for example - not even starting sentences with capital letters. That’s why it stands out when something is written too well to be human. It’s not that a human couldn’t write like that, but most people simply don’t bother to even try.
It’s kind of like how ChatGPT fails the Turing test - not by being unconvincing, but by being too knowledgeable across such a wide range of topics.
Many. Yet they’re still justified in striking a nuclear bomb-making facility in a nation that has more or less said it plans to use it.