

I’m trying to determine if we are using words to mean the same things. It seems we are not.
Since I don’t take issue with your goals, only your vocabulary, I suppose that continuing to discuss it is pointless.
I’m trying to determine if we are using words to mean the same things. It seems we are not.
Since I don’t take issue with your goals, only your vocabulary, I suppose that continuing to discuss it is pointless.
Would you claim that the soap box failed of no-one spoke against him?
Would you claim the jury box failed if he was never brought to trial?
What liberty are you talking about? The liberty of approved leaders? It’s a failure because we voted for a bad leader?
We got the leader we voted for. The failure is in the people.
That’s not my idea of liberty at all. But you can’t say the ballot box failed, just because the people elected the worst president in the history of people in suits.
So, you propose to enforce liberty by not letting us choose our own leaders? Democracy, as long as your approve our choices?
Also, that whole thing is nonsense of the highest order.
the only time I was ever hesitant about a vaccine was the smallpox vaccine that they brought out just as I was enlisting. It was widly reported that it was risky to take, as it contained actual virus, rather than just the recognition bits.
In retrospect, I have no idea if the reporting was accurate, misinformed, or fearmongering. But at the time, it worried me.
This isn’t complicated. You either choose to obey an illegal order and threaten/attack other American citizens, or you don’t.
Would you be willing to risk ten years in prison that a military judge will agree that an order to go stand somewhere is illegal?
I love me some Stratigo.