

Isn’t the fact that those accounts disagree with each other, and are in fact sometimes contradictory (and that important stuff such as trinity, holy ghost, all came much later) cause to suspect that a lot of core modern Christian tenets are not based in historical truth?
Certainly there was a historical Jesus who did some stuff and inspired a religion. That much I think is indisputable.
Edit: this original part is all about Trinitarianism:
Hmm, I was sure they were not.
Could I hassle you for passage numbers (and language and edition) to educate myself on the matter?
Edit p2.: Matthew and Luke disagree on things like Joseph’s family and whether Jesus was born in or on the way to Bethlehem. As just two of the many discrepancies between the 4 Evangelist gospels.