• 1 Post
  • 13 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle
  • There are plenty, as others have said, it has been able to help a lot in science. It has been used for finding new drugs, search for composite materials.

    Sadly i don’t think the pros will outweigh the cons, the society as is right now won’t let it happen. I truly think this tool, even without any fancy AGI, if used in a responsible manner could help us solve some of the most pressing problems the world has.

    But it won’t happen, look at the irresponsible manner the capitalist society has rolled out this tech, which is still in its infancy. It has wasted tons and tons of energy on models that are not yet fully mature. Brute force training of shit models just to get the best monthly benchmark over competitors. It’s so sad to see all the promised goals in terms of saving energy and water that went to garbage the moment the AI hype exploded.

    And what we got for that? A bunch of models causing problems because they are not ready. Executives cutting workforce, in part to justify the use the new shiny tooling, only to get shittier services. And worse of all, shortage of water and energy to pump more compute.

    Even if we get to a future where AI is cheap, powerful and capable, it will only be used to widen the gap between the wealthy and the common people.

    Stephen Hawking said it way more eloquently already in 2016

    The potential benefits of creating intelligence are huge. […]. Perhaps with the tools of this new technological revolution, we will be able to undo some of the damage done to the natural world by the last one — industrialization. And surely we will aim to finally eradicate disease and poverty. […] In short, success in creating AI, could be the biggest event in the history of our civilization.

    But it could also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks. Alongside the benefits, AI will also bring dangers, like powerful autonomous weapons, or new ways for the few to oppress the many. It will bring great disruption to our economy.

    Link Article

    Sorry for the doomer rant, its a conflicted topic for me, feel free to skip.



  • (From South America)

    About phones, same advice as monovergent, i use a separate phone for things that require google and another one for work. It’s not ideal since they probably can correlate them, but it’s the best compromise i found.

    About ID, you are required to show it for most of the things you ask, which I think is reasonable. We don’t have face id thankfully yet





  • I did, but i don’t know if changing things there will cause conflicts.

    Since i have no experience using luci i don’t know what behaviour is normal or expected, and to what extent the custom software glinet uses changes it. Do you think that tweeking the preconfigured networks would cause conflicts in the long run?

    After sleeping over it, im leaning towards going full vanilla. It should be easier to find tutorials to solve and isolate problems.

    Anyways thanks for your comment.




  • Fair enough, now i feel a bit ashamed since you are way way more knowledgeable than me. I have only been a Debian user for a year and half.

    I made the reply because i remember that when i was looking to enter into Linux, Debian testing was recommended as a great compromise between stable and unstable.

    My surprise when i went to the Debian wiki and said, pretty ambiguously at that, that i shouldn’t use it! Reason being that it wasn’t as updated in security patches as stable. No one told me that bit when i was asking. Since i didn’t know the risks involved, i took the safe option and went with stable, in the end loved it.

    I have to admit that for your case it makes sense to use it. You know the risks, know where to patch it up, and it helps to contribute to it by testing it and submitting bugs. Thank you!

    I do still think that testing shouldn’t be recommended, but i see and agree that it has it’s niche where it works and can be great for some people.

    Anyways, i hope i didn’t came too hostile in my first reply! Cheers


  • I disagree, the strong points of debian are the stability (long periods of testing, without new changes) and security (by applying security updates quickly).

    Using testing or sid means to forego the strong points. At that point you are better served by other distros which focus on having newer packages.

    Also i would be cautious about using Debian testing (forky).As far as i know its the worst in terms of security. Stable has security update priority over testing. And some people say even sid it’s better on that front by having even newer packages.

    Disclaimer: I daily drive debian stable and game on it without hiccups. Rock solid. BUT i have 7 year old amd rig and the games are not demanding.




  • In Latin America most public services, banks ans bussines uses whatspps as their main support line.

    To give you an example, if you have no water in your house you need to report on wp. No other way. And this is the standard for a lot of services, wp is the ONLY way to ask for support.

    Also, if you are a freelancer or have a bussiness, your clients expect you to have whatsapp, 90% of inquiries and sales goes through wp.

    It’s a nightmare, i really want to get rid of meta services but it is impossible for my case.

    I have decided to decouple what i can, and use different phones for meta services, but i suspect that they still correlate and collect data. (Based on location, wifi, mac of iot, browsing etc)

    Anyways, i ask people to be aware that for some of us, our situations makes impossible to remove some of the meta, microsoft or google services.

    My aproach for now is to only use the minimum neccesary, i still search for ways to gradually switch out what i can.

    Whatever i can’t rid off, i have another phone for it, how effecrive this is idk but for now is the best solution i found.