Agreed & my problem with “least bad candidate” or “blue no matter who” is that someone like Trump is the inevitable outcome when that’s the only thing they’re running on. Many of us have been voting “the lessor of two evils” for our entire adult lives and all its done is continue allow the right to get even more batshit insane and then the Dems follow right behind, just being less crazy and happily taking advantage of minorities for votes (but, look at how they actually treat Trans people when it matters, all of a sudden it “doesn’t poll well” to continue treating them as people).
They just expect to get votes because “we’re less shitty than the other candidate!” as if that’s the only thing that matters as they continue to give in to Republican whims at the slightest sign that actual work will need to be done to oppose them (can’t be too obstinate, ya know, you might offend the fascist voters you’re trying to court!)
They had weeks of forewarning for Rowe vs Wade being overturned due to the leak and had NO PLAN at all to oppose them when the news dropped other than “give us some money so we can continue to do absolutely fucking nothing to fix this”, no unified message, nothing’. Say what you will about Republicans, but the second women and black people started being treated like people under the law, they started thinking to the future and were determined to make sure they could roll that back no matter how long it took.
ETA: I’m not saying don’t vote or both sides are exactly the same. They’re not at all the same. One is clearly better than the other, but the one that’s ‘better’ won’t actually fight to keep you having rights and will only fight back just the minimum amount to keep donations rolling in from individuals while actively trying to court the rich and corporations for their donations instead and I really hate the lack of good options we have.
That sounds accurate. I have all my devices assigned a specific IP address, based on their MAC address, but that’s only per-interface. The other interfaces aren’t aware of my assignments for each other.
If I connect my phone to my LAN SSID, it’ll get its assigned IP, but if I connect it to the NOT [network of things, no internet access] SSID, it’ll get assigned a new address out of the DHCP pool because I haven’t assigned it an IP on that interface, until I assign it an IP. But, which VLAN it’s connected to will determine which IP its getting, and it still requires me to know the passwords for each SSID.
I believe where you’re getting confused is that a some businesses (or homelabs) might use a RADIUS server which will be more like this: ONE_SINGLE_SSID-Broadcast -> Device connects -> RADIUS Server detects account/certificate/MAC -> RADIUS Server assigns interface -> Device connects to VLAN the RADIUS server granted it access to
So, in that scenario, if the ONLY thing that’s being used to validate the access is the devices MAC address, just changing the MAC address will effectively grant a completely different level of access with nothing else changing. Most people in a homelab (and even plenty of larger businesses) aren’t running the infrastructure to do this though, they’re just effectively connecting a VLAN to a port and then that port can only be used to connect to that VLAN. They’re doing the same with the WiFi SSIDs where each SSID connects directly to the VLAN.
Usually though, for places that are implementing the RADIUS server, they’ll also install a certificate on their devices and the certificate needs to be in place in order to get certain access otherwise the RADIUS server will authorize less permissive access or just won’t allow access at all. Or, it’ll also need a user to log in to gain additional access.
For wired, the company may also implement port locking where the port will only allow a certain amount of MAC addresses to connect (presumably one unless there is also a VOICE VLAN with a phone being used, in which case it’d be two) where if you change your MAC address (or connect a different device), the port will lock and won’t power POE devices and won’t allow connectivity until an admin clears the lock. It’s possible that they may have multiple VLANs allowed on the port and client side you can change VLANs, but, this isn’t typically done on all ports, usually only on trusted ports or ports that need the multiple VLANs (my VM server for instance has access to a port that’ll allow multiple VLANs and I just enter the tag I need when I create the VM). This would be similar to your WiFi scenario, the port with the WAP connected to it will have access to multiple VLANs and then those WLANs just connect to the VLAN that they’re assigned to.
TL;DR - Typically one wireless SSID connects to one VLAN and if you want to jump to the other VLAN you’d need to connect to the other SSID, so you still have the individual passwords protecting you. On wired, typically VLANs are assigned per port and you can’t jump between then, but where they aren’t, it should be in a planned way and not just every port having access to every VLAN. Bad implementations exist though, so, anything is possible.