They were carrying 2 tons of supply, so Cuba at least got something but that’s less than a truck can carry. I don’t know of any solar panel technology that could provide “5-10MW” that could be shipped in just 2 tons.

A1, where it’s always April Fools’.

A man after my own incompetence.

Iran is going to receive support from China, North Korea, and Russia. Meanwhile those gulf allies have a merchant economy that relies on one single primary manufacturer for their bare-bone military and the rest of NATO isn’t joining in. They don’t need to get played when they are playing themselves.

Trump’s ultimatums mean nothing when Iran realizes they are still going to escalate the conflict into a land invasion.

The only thing that makes the EU bureaucracy seem like it’s functional are competing national interests. When all nations are being targeted by foreign automated propaganda through their social networks to promote shifts in their governments to allow this sort of bull, it doesn’t even matter that the US is directly issuing threats against the EU, only just what corrupt long time career politicians can get out of it.

Sort of a pull yourself by your own bootstraps problem, although there’s been more than enough opportunities. It’s just easier to blame society as a whole and do nothing except all the ways we’ve been told are the legitimate ways to protest - which don’t include prosecuting for treason and sedition.

deleted by creator

An entire industry’s worth of engagement algorithms.

And did they? I would have gone with refined uranium, that stuff is pretty valuable. I must have missed where they can carry the freight containers worth of solar panels you claim they are.

Span the World

Being that some of those places have monarchies themselves, maybe protesters could get past the whole American anti-King culture this tries to rile up and focus on it being anti-authoritarian. Maybe even, anti-fascist? Whoops, on a list now.

j/k I’ve always been on a list

Strawman much?

Where’s Lavos when you need it.

I’m sorry, I cannot understand your comment.

It’s almost poetic that the country that has financed and created the AI slop problem to where it is now gets burned by it to this degree.

Since OP won’t make any effort to defend this, I will.

In these sort of cases, wouldn’t it be more appropriate for the court to fine the company the $22 million to the company, award a more appropriate stipend to the victim that does not actively promote and reward with wealth gaps, pay the lawyers, and to then allow her to be the executor with what’s left in regards to being able to be spent to prevent similar abuses from happening in the future, with the responsibility falling back to the judge if she does not want to be? She would then be limited in how she could spend that, but she could spend it however she wants for that purpose - create a political campaign, finance unions, etc.

Where? The only thing OP is doing is not actually engaging in good faith by being completely dismissive when they are engaged.

You could just choose not to respond. If someone respectfully asks something, either answer or don’t. The only stupid retort I found was yours to those sort of questions.

You made a point and failed to carry it home. Why even bother to post here? Just wanted people to tell you you are right? Wrong audience.

Just because there were ways to do it before does not mean they were as easy to use or as cheap as AI, and just because there are other ways to cheat doesn’t whataboutism clear away any criticism of the most notoriously popular method.

Does a good parent place restrictions on what their child can and can’t do? Yes. The thing about bad parents is that they are notoriously irresponsible. They would be the least likely to utilize such a feature.