Ok fair, but I still think that “a few bugs that make it not act like i3” is quite different from “doesn’t have backwards compat with i3 right”.
None of those bugs affect me, so I can see why my perspective of Sway being perfectly usable may differ from other users whose workflow is broken.
Looking forward to Sway having fifo, seems to work well in KDE and Gnome
So don’t use Sway, plenty of DEs are more polished.
Most of the bugs you linked to are not related to Nvidia or the post. I don’t know who is suprised thay Sway, which is relatively new, has unresolved bugs that i3, which is older, does not have.
Definitely not all of the Nvidia users, since I am one, and have no issues at all. I am even on an “unsupported” configuration, since I use Sway and they don’t officially support Nvidia.
Wayland does not suck on 60% of graphics cards. No need to spread misinformation
They are probably running a system full of “workaround” environment variables that are not needed anymore or something like that, and seeing issues because of it.
I’ve also had a flawless experience with Nvidia & Wayland recently.
Top one is bonkers, would not recommend using it except for meme purposes.
This isn’t a donation, this is free advertising for Musk to have the police rolling around Vegas in his trucks.
My grandma referred to dogs as bugs (positively) and you know what, I agree
Start avoiding Logitech then. I have had three of their Anywhere MX mice of various generations, and now an MX Master mouse. They are expensive, and have ALL had switches start failing, that I had to replace and solder. Two of my coworkers have the same mouse, and like clockwork, after one and a half years one started failing. The other one is not at this mark yet, but I bet the same will happen.
I bought a Keychron mouse to replace it. It was also cheaper.
And to clarify, my comment was not to say it was expected that mice would last that short, rather that it is possible to use it enough that it falls within the expected lifespan in clicks of the switches they give.
I mean I work 5 days a week so there is that already. That plus playing games on the evenings and weekends and I bet you can near that easily.
That’s only once every 3 seconds if you use it 8 hours per day for work.
Of course, but you said:
But the code indent is wrong, and it even changed the function definition of the unrelated next function.
It is weird to split the two in your sentence, as only the indentation of the next function definition was changed, not the definition itself.
You can just take the L and say you didn’t see that the function definition that was “added” was just “removed” at the top. It is an easy mistake to make, I know I’ve done it many times.
Actually the function definition is unchanged. The line that was “added” at the bottom was also “removed” at the top. This is just the Git diff generator being confused, which won’t come as a surprise to anyone that has ever used it.
The indendentation really is messed-up though.
Funny they just said “here” and you assumed the US.
Oh multi-window works, it is mostly just that applications cannot geometrically position them themselves. There are other small issues, but thay is the main one I hear. It is a non-issue for things like settings and Transmission, since you just open another window and do not really care exactly where it os relative to the other ones. It often ends up being on top. For multi-window Gimp it is worse, as it is toolbars and modules, and the app wants to place them precisely relative to one another. This is currently not working in Wayland, but they create new extensions all the time so it is only a matter of time IMO.
I assume “weird two-monitors setups” that are not so common, not two-monitor setups as a whole, as Wayland works perfectly with two monitors. It even works way better than X11 if your monitors are different, like if only one has VRR or if both monitors need different scaling.
Average Subaru driver tbh
Well yeah there evidence, the title doesn’t match the article.
Why are you so angry?
Many communities here have a rule to keep the original title, and even out of those it is good form.
But I must repeat: why are you so angry? Is this just how you are or does this reply really make you this angry?