Not all guards of concentration camps or SS members were prosecuted. That was also an unusual situation as the Nazi state and the SS ceased to exist and was occupied for decades.

No ICE agent will be prosecuted for conducting arrests or executing warrants against illegal immigrants. Once mass torture, inhumane treatment, extralegal executions and such start, it becomes more risky for them.

We don’t know how bad it will get yet or what comes after. In the best case Trump and republicans lose the next elections. A New Democrat government could simply downsize ICE and only prosecute a handful of bad apples. Remember what happened after Abu Ghraib.

The SS had many tasks. One of them was to protect the regime against coups from the army or SA.

At the beginning the SA also ran concentration camps, the SS took them over soon.

SS, Gestapo, and regular police were all under Himmler’s command via the Reichssicherheitshauptamt.

Gestapo was formed from preexisting secret political police forces.

Trumpism operates differently than Nazism. However Trump needs a loyal oppression infrastructure to build a more authoritarian system. ICE is on its way to enable that.

If you don’t live next to a government building or in the same house as IRGC officers, your house should be safe.

Shrapnel can fly very far and there’s also falling bullets and debris from anti air fires.

Stay safe and good luck.

Anticipatory self defense is a legal under international law. Aiding other countries is self defense is legal ans well. Iran has repeatedly and loudly espoused its desire to destroy Israel. Destroying countries is illegal under international law as well.

There’s no case law regarding anticipatory self defense, express desire to destroy, and nuclear arms development. So if the strikes on Iranian nuclear sites are covered is as of yet not firmly established.

You could also argue that Israel and Iran are in continued hostilities, so it’s not a new attack on a country but a continuation of hostilities. See the Iranian rocket attacks and Israeli air strikes from last year. The conflict between these two goes back decades and there has never been a peace treaty.

Iran is a member of the IAEA voluntarily. Not all countries are.

You didn’t let the IAEA look at all your stuff, Iran. You are obligated by the NPT to allow them access.

Yes, the argument about no trans people in bathrooms is about the others feeling safe.

I’m sure you can find news about assaults by cis men in bathrooms as well.

https://www.todayinbc.com/news/man-charged-after-alleged-sexual-assault-in-bathroom-in-vancouvers-stanley-park-8018581

https://globalnews.ca/news/11205876/vpd-bathroom-assault-teen/

Of course the whole trans bathroom debate is controversial and gets more views.

There are cases.

Trans people are people and can be abusive or assault others just like everybody else. Trans folk have to deal with more mental health issues than the average person. I’m just guessing, but it might make them more likely to be victims of violence or to abuse others.

These are just a few from the first page of DDG results.

https://www.fox5dc.com/news/former-student-convicted-sexually-assaulting-two-girls-released-loudoun-county-judge

https://www.kxii.com/content/news/Transgender-woman-allegedly-sexually-assaults-teen-in-walmart-505820451.html

https://nypost.com/2023/06/01/oklahoma-parent-files-suit-after-daughter-was-beaten-by-trans-student/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/transgender-wyoming-woman-convicted-of-sexually-assaulting-10-year-old-girl-in-bathroom

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2021/10/29/trans-bathroom-policy-sexual-assault/8568005002/

Of course this is only anecdotal.

Bathroom restrictions don’t protect against abusers of any gender. People should feel safe using a bathroom regardless of their gender or sexuality.