

She could go one step further and try to convince a jury that he is in fact a rapist based on the evidence in the previous case. Different jury, maybe a different outcome. It’s a roll of the dice I don’t think he’d be willing to take.
edit: Fuckin’ hilarious though that they’re raging with the logic of “HE’S ONLY A SEXUAL ABUSER!!!” hahahahaha.
Oh damn. That’s a beauty. Right from the mouth of the judge.