Fri, Jan 9, 2026
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩
⏱️ 6m 44s | 💡 0 hints | ❌ 0 mistakes
🌟 Friday success! Almost have the full picture now! 📊
🎲 Gossipdle - Daily Logic Grid Puzzle
Use clues to identify characters through deduction!
Play at: https://www.gossipdle.com/
misspelledusernme
- 0 Posts
- 11 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
Cake day: March 28th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
2·1 month agoWordle 1,663 4/6 ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨 🟨🟩⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟩🟨⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Wed, Jan 7, 2026 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⏱️ 9m 36s | 💡 0 hints | ❌ 0 mistakes 💪 Wednesday win! Halfway there - the mastermind is within reach! 🎪 🎲 Gossipdle - Daily Logic Grid Puzzle Use clues to identify characters through deduction! Play at: https://www.gossipdle.com/
Less than 8 minutes 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩
Mon, Jan 5, 2026 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⏱️ 5m 31s | 💡 0 hints | ❌ 0 mistakes ✅ Monday intelligence secured! 6 more days to catch the mastermind! 💼 🎲 Gossipdle - Daily Logic Grid Puzzle Use clues to identify characters through deduction! Play at: https://www.gossipdle.com/```
3·2 months agoI thought this part was interesting. People are correct about the amount of toxic content (~33%) but just missattributes it to an equivalent share of the population.
These findings reveal a striking pattern in how people misunderstand online toxicity. Participants drastically overestimated how many users posted toxic comments on social media—believing it was 38% when it is actually 3% (a 13-fold overestimation). However, they were nearly accurate about how much total content this set of users produces—estimating 38% when it is actually 33% (a 1.15-fold overestimation). This suggests people may encounter toxic content at roughly the expected volume but attribute it to far more widespread participation than actually occurs. Rather than recognizing a small group of highly active accounts, people appear to imagine toxic behavior as broadly distributed across the user base.
2·2 months agoThank you for that long write-up! I’m glad to see more progress. I’ll keep an eye on defense news
I’d like to learn more about the progress on the rearmament of Europe. Do you have any long form resources I could read?
I only hear bits and pieces about the slow progress. I remember hearing the goal that the EU would produce X amounts of ammunition per year. Did that happen? I also recently heard about Ukraine opening a factory in Denmark. That seems good, but still not the broad rearmament I’ve been wanting to see.
Are there good overviews, with some stats and maybe some nice looking graphics? I realize a lot is secret, but still.
Edit: I decided not to be a lazy bum and did my own googling. I found this testimony about the “Danish Model” by a member of CSIS. I learnt that Ukraine has capacity to produce $35B of military equipment per year, but only $6B to spend. Other countries are purchasing another $10B worth of military equipment per year from Ukrainian producers. This is the Danish model.
14·3 months agoI’m a bit confused. The case seems to be about sexual harassment and unpaid wages. The part about selling pardons doesn’t seem relevant to that. To my understanding it’s not illegal to sell pardons, it’s just highly unethical and corrupt.
“almost”. They seem suspiciously relieved as they reach the driveway