

JFC, as if this guy wasn’t already the poster child for cringe.
JFC, as if this guy wasn’t already the poster child for cringe.
Some guys are lying assholes and horrible people, but so are some women.
and some guys anonymously posing as women online to undermine the competition.
My current conspiracy theory is that Trump’s owners have decided that he’s become more of a liability than an asset, and are throwing him under the bus to replace him with someone more under their control.
My “evidence” is that this steady daily trickle of new evidence tying Trump to Epstein didn’t just miraculously spawn into existence this week. It’s been in people’s filing cabinets and video/photo archives for years
I just find it really hard to believe none of this was “found” earlier. Instead it’s being “found” now, but not all at once. It’s being “found” at a rate that keeps the story at the top of the news cycle.
Many people are saying…
Did Ozzy Osbourne really eat a bat onstage? Rock’s most outrageous rumor, explained
The answer is: yes, kinda, a little bit, but there’s some contours to the tale.
Capital gains taxes are already non-existent for a vast majority of people selling a house they’ve been using as their primary residence. This is just another gift to the super wealthy.
He’s grasping at every straw he can reach to try to get people talking about anything other than the Epstein files. There must be some serious shit about him in there.
Not GoFundMe.
Connor now claims he was fired for his views and has launched a fundraising page on GiveSendGo, a Christian crowdfunding site which has faced criticism for hosting extremist causes.
He’s just trying to manufacturer distractions from Epstein conversations. Stay focused!
What they’re not designed to do is give factual answers
or mental health therapy
Or, more likely, heavily cherry picked.
See, there’s nothing incriminating in THESE documents, so you can trust when we say that there’s nothing incriminating in the rest of them, either.
" It doesn’t matter if the enemy is called Hamas, Islamic Jihad, or any other name,” he added.
How about, “Palestinian children?”
That would make sense, but, directly from the website…
Plasma Bigscreen is an open-source user interface for TV’s. Running on top of a Linux distribution, Plasma Bigscreen turns your TV or setup-box into a fully hackable device. A big launcher giving you easy access to any installed apps and skills. Controllable via voice or TV remote.
Using the multi-platform toolkit Qt, the flexible extensions of KDE Frameworks plus the power of Plasma Shell, Plasma Bigscreen is built with technology which feels equally at home on the desktop, mobile devices and TV.
I would highlight the following from that…
TV or setup-box
Controllable via voice or TV remote
feels equally at home on the desktop, mobile devices and TV.
But I don’t know anything other than what I’m reading on the website, so 🤷. I’ll be eagerly waiting to see what happens.
Other than the dev, probably not.
As of right now, Plasma Bigscreen isn’t available for public use yet. This is due to not being developed for so long. The project has been revived, but it might take a while until it becomes stable and is available for public use. You can check the status of Plasma Bigscreen on the Matrix channel or the KDE Invent repository. https://plasma-bigscreen.org/
But I want to know, when it is available, what TVs will it run on, what will the install/upgrade process look like, etc.
I imagine Trump has personal experience with knowing what “committing mortgage fraud” looks like.
Hadn’t heard about this one, and had to look it up. So, for others in the same boat…
It depends on what info you’re trying to find.
I was recently trying to figure out the name of a particular uncommon type of pipe fitting. I could describe what it looked like, but had no idea what it was called. I described it to chatgpt, which gave me a name, which I could then search for with a normal search engine to confirm that the name was correct. Sure enough, search results took me to plumbing supply companies selling it, with pictures that matched what I described.
But, asking it when a particular feature got added to a piece of software? There’s no additional information one would get from the answer to help them confirm that the answer is correct.
ETA: The above strategy has also failed me many times, though, where chatgpt gives me information that follow-up searches only confirmed that chatgpt hallucinated the answer. Just wanted to say that to reinforce that you have to assume it’s hallucinating until you get independent confirmation.
This is a clear example of bureaucrats getting so focused on their task that they miss the forest for the trees. They need to have a little conversation with themselves.