I understand we would. I just left a shower thought on the possibility that an entity, if exists, called God would. Not trying to be pedantic here, just an amusing thought. 🙂

Thanks

Cool, thanks 👍

Honestly, it is not worth it and only mildly funny. You didn’t miss anything.

It seems there is evidence that our larynx moves when we think. So the inner voice is actually ours as well.

You sound young, so this response is based on that judgement (pardon me)

Answer to your question - No you won’t. You decide how you want to live your life. You can look however you want as you age up.

Another thing to be mindful of - Life is shorter than it seems. Prejudices are needless burdens that creep into our minds — the sooner we let them go, the more fully we can live.

Ah. I got baited 😆

💯

You mean it doesn’t exist ? Perhaps I should be clear since I wrote just two lines.

If you take top comments on any (even non political) popular posts, there will be someone posting an intentionally controversial, yet unrelated, comment. I guess it boosts engagement of the post, or the commenter gets karma (or whatever fake points) or just some lunatics doing it for the kick of it. The problem is most people reacting to such comments doesn’t realise they were just baited into it.

Hence the thought in the shower 🚿

At first, drowsy me read the whole thing after reading the first line as “Teri Hatcher”.

I was surprised that many people didn’t know this magical ✨ shortcut

Ctrl + Shift + t
Cmd + Shift + t

If you accidentally closed a tab in a browser, it will reopen it. Most browsers also lets you open closed tabs one after the other.

It is easy to remember to since it is just a shift away from new tab shortcut

Ctrl + t
Cmd + t

Wow. That’s a great feature. I need to look out for it next time. Thank you

Unpopular opinion - yes but not exactly

Searching the web is/was always like making a prompt. The difference before the current AI hype was that it was a different kind of algorithm, but still an algorithm tailored to make profit for the company. Or in other words, it was never in the user’s control on what information is received from the web. That is the nature of the web itself until, to some extent, we hopefully reach a dystopian decentralised non profit web. And hey we might even get there because you are reading this on Lemmy.

To be clear, OP is not questioning the validity either. You are, and that’s a separate discussion.

If I tell you “playing with fire is risky”, and then you bring up an old book to me where is it written “playing with fire is risky”, the discussion is not about whether I told you that from the book. It is not about whether my advice is valid or the book is valid. The discussion is just that people who had read the book should have already known “playing with fire is risky”.

I’m not religious. But your point doesn’t make sense. Being around X number of years doesn’t contradict with the possibility of one idea being a part of the other. I guess that’s what the user is trying to say, but I’m not sure how factual it is.