can you give an example of anything you’re claiming here?

A lot of the fallout from 08 found its way to otherwise successful businesses offering luxury services, like hotels and restaurants.

The format is in its “LinkedIn viral” phase of life, so it should be fully dead soon

Or one with a source lol

Edit: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333668227_Reforming_to_SurviveThe_Bolshevik_Origins_of_Social_Policies

I read “unnamed” as “unarmed”

1147km straight line, so 450kmh average. Not out of reach for a vehicle with a 500kmh top speed, assuming minimum distance which entails all straight.

I agree ‘could’ is doing a lot of work there, but ‘just no’ is also pretty far off imo

The only permanent aspect of politics is that nothing is permanent. In the modern age it seems to mean 2-10 years

they’re probably already covered for that

Can you ELI5 how an automatic disqualifier based on a conviction that doesn’t account for whether or not someone is a victim doesn’t automatically disqualify those victims without just saying they’re “probably already covered”

Edit to add: I don’t see the relevance of what person C says if person A and B aren’t going to be taken at their word, either. Durbin’s words on the topic matter only as much as anyone else’s in a vacuum, and his claim as to what is and isn’t currently policy is as meaningless as anyone else’s if it’s unsubstantiated

I don’t think Kash is attending most interviews, and I while I use someone’s name as a reason to raise an eyebrow and look into something more than I typically would, I don’t base my reason for it being bad solely on the name of the person who did it.

So like, for real though, the justification for this was that there are people who are victims of trafficking that are forced into this, right?

At face value, that makes sense. I’m not sure whether every state that convicts for beastiality would also create exceptions for victims of trafficking who were forced into it, they certainly do not when it comes to other offenses.

Is there something I’ve missed?

Neat!

You open ports to internet?

Thank you! Apparently my wife has used LaTeX previously, so I might even have a leg up. Thanks again, I’ll check out that template :)

CV in LO Writer; my bad.

For the latter two: never really paid mind to latex and never heard of typst. I’ll give typst a shot :)

That’s exactly the nuance I’m longing for; are you comfortable sharing which state? The precedent I’m familiar with uses a person’s general expectation of privacy in a given environment as a test, which I understand but disagree with. I would much rather the standard be how your state handles it.

Yeah, this is pretty much my experience. I don’t really use Excel, but anytime I brush up my resume LO makes me a little sad.

If you’re referring to states where 2 party consent laws carry weight outside of phone calls, then to my not-a-lawyer knowledge it requires there be a reasonable expectation of privacy, which is pretty well established to exclude public (or private but open to public, like a mall) spaces. I think that exclusion is generally BS, but I really do recognize the difficult balance of freedom of press vs individual privacy. I just think there could be a good bit more nuance

Holy shit

You’re telling me that is routing requests through a model 70x the price?

1. Americans are a minority on the internet
2. It’s a joke, being built on truth and fact is not a core requirement