Huh? I don’t get it…

Niche-ception.

Removed by mod

He brought up Epstein to distract from the a pointless war only to now attempt to distract Epstein again. Trump is just tumbling down an endless flight of stairs at this point.

Edit: I take it tankies from .ml didn’t like that hefty dose of sarcasm.

“I was just joking, guys!”

The fuck?

Where were you when Russia made bomb threats while everyone was voting in the 2024 election, Vance?

Sounds like we do have plenty of money that could be used for healthcare, public transit, affordable housing, etc.

When is it not about money with this guy?

Not sure how buying a podcast is going to help pay the bills, Altman.

Also be transparent when you have vibecoded commits. There’s no reason to hide it.

I find it rather ironic that one thing they are transparent about is the covering up the evidence that proves it was vibecoded. Apparently, they never heard of the Strainsand Effect.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago.

He knew it was going to be an issue. This wasn’t about being attacked.

“the Biden Administration and Secretary Yellen remained focused on DEI and Critical Race Theory policies.”

And yet, the new 2026 design features a woman? Seems to go against their anti-DEI movement but okay.

Thank you. Another issue that sort of overlaps with the hallucination problem is the fact that it is basically is referring to snapshot in time. Based on my past attempts, no amount of searching the web will improve results because it has no idea to account for future outcomes like actual programmers can. Meaning, it isn’t very flexible and can’t adopt to new, breaking or quality of life changes.

Programming is a hobby for me and my preferred language is C#. I work on the bleeding edge for fun and so I can benefit from .NET’s recent quality of life changes. Naturally, I’m Microsoft’s target audience. And yet for the reasons stated above, these chatbots can’t work for me in the long run.

The maintainer openly admitted to suspecting this would be become an issue and hid the co-authorship, promptly telling the “haters” to wish them luck finding the AI generated code. Who are the insufferable ones here again?

By telling people he expected this and obfuscating the authorship afterwards, he is doing damage in the form of eroding trust for a tool that has otherwise proven reliable.

As I’ve said in an earlier thread, AI over engineers code and hallucinates APIs that don’t exist. Furthermore, hallucinations themselves are a very well studied phenomenon that has proven difficult to combat. People have very legit compliments about AI that you seem to be determined to dismiss as nothing more than a culture war.

As I said: judge the result, not the workflow.

I’ve tested AI myself and seen the results. I’ll judge how I see fit.

AI has caused plenty of headaches for developers. This isn’t some culture war shit.

I tried fitting AI into my workloads just as an experiment and failed. It’ll frequently reference APIs that don’t even exist or over engineer the shit out of something could be written in just a few lines of code. Often it would be a combo of the two.