Removed by mod

I’m disengaging here - you are free to disagree with my perspective

Must be hard having no evidence for your claims. Keep living in fantasy land.

Maybe link sources like I’m doing. Cuz all I see is crying and coping. I’m sure that the wapo also failed to see what a random on lemmy sees so clearly…

Inform yourself.

The 2016 Democratic primary wasn’t rigged by the DNC, and it certainly wasn’t rigged against Sanders. But Democratic elites did try to make Clinton’s nomination as inevitable, as preordained, as possible. And the party is still managing the resentment that engendered in voters. “Once somebody doesn’t trust you,” sighs Buckley, the New Hampshire Democratic chair, “it’s very hard to get that trust back.”

Who never got a chance in a general election because he got ratfucked 2x in a row by the Democratic Party et. al.

This is just major debunked cope. People seem to forget, but when Trump ran for the first time, the whole “establishment” hated him, both left and right. Hell, even the heritage foundation didn’t want him. Until he got too big to ignore, he won through sheer brute force popularity. Bernie just lost the primaries to Hillary…if you think America has any capability right now to see anyone to the left of Bernie in power, you’re just delusional.

Current America would rather take an old bumbling corrupt criminal rapist(pedo too?) brainlet instead of a qualified intelligent prosecutor/AG because a woman of colour is a bit too much. Don’t make the mistake of thinking your niche is anywhere near the norm.

Kamala was the opposite of radical

She wasn’t portrayed/perceived that way at all, you understand that right? You and everyone else with some political awareness might think that, but the magats and even a shitload of “centrists” (quotes because most have been captured by the magats without being aware) think she was radical.

…why do you believe that?

E.g. Bernie. The most milquetoast “radical” tested

America only has an appetite for far right radicals atm, clearly.

As if any candidate you would consider radical would have any chance in hell of winning

Because the religious and/or kooks don’t sit well with the chaos/randomness of life.

The guy who’s godfather was Marcelo Catano? Really?

Who your godfather is determines if you’re a fascist? lmao

I was the one who deleted the comment btw. It says “deleted by creator”, so not sure why you’re chasing me and yapping about mods. Illiterate?

A true comrade, nothing of substance to add. lmao

Came to aid your comrade since he’s clearly struggling?

deleted by creator

Removed by mod

As I said: I’m not in the business of comparing imperialists

That’s just shorthand for “I want to dodge any of the details/nuance because the facts are not on my side”.

You could accuse, but the evidence suggests you’d be wrong. Still waiting on that list of territories that NATO has annexed. For someone who’s so “concerned” about imperialism, you sure do carry a lot of water for what is likely the biggest offender of the past two decades.

I don’t care about your meaningless pontificating. You either dodge questions because you have no valid response or just shit out garbage with no substance.

You first vatnik

What? Is that absurd? You must’ve missed the tenet media story, among the pile of other ones.

I’m not in the business of comparing imperialists.

You’re gonna have to point out which territories NATO has annexed. What a load of nonsense.

The main enemy of every people is in their own country

Agreed, the ruzzian-funded puppets in their own country