However some of the “reasons” it’s concluded as fake in this are not strong arguments.
The time stamp would depend on the date set in the camera which could easily be wrong. A lot of people never set those.
The odd angles are actually more indicating it’s not AI.
Like the tiny sliver of Clinton’s pants (left leg) close to Trump body.
The photo was taken with a flash in low lighting which would remove a lot of shadows.
The pattern on the carpet is not sharp enough to determine if it’s consistent or not.
Furthermore this “style” of photo is not common in AI. Infact Ive never seen it. It looks like an old film or digital camera with flash on in low lighting. Which is why the aperture is wide open and it has a shallow depth of field.
All proper hands, fingers, and feet are positioned properly in the appropriate number.
If it’s fake. It’s photo manipulation.
No reference photos have been found though that could have been used.
These may also turn up in Epstein files.
Which would just cause more questions rather than give answers.
That’s kinda what I was thinking more so someone put there too downplay any actual thought about ai images that may come out in the future vs the real ones
when you share content to the public with little to no context it will be misconstrued and reshared as “evidence”.
what happens when there is a bunch of falsified or unverifiable “evidence” about a particular crime? all evidence comes into question.
why would that happen? because the defense will always attempt to discredit the claims against them and weaken the actual evidence.
if this miraculously goes to trial, the first argument the defense attorney will make is, “how can any of this ‘evidence’ be trusted if there’s so much of it that can easily be faked by the general public? how can we be assured that the accused isn’t being targeted by their political opponents and slandered?”
so, by posting and refusing to provide context of the joke and refusing to remove the fake image, they are supporting pedophiles and spreading misinformation.
It’s actually not verified to be AI. Nothing in the image is erroneous.
If it’s fake, it’s a photoshopped fake image.
I’m on the fence if it’s real or not. That’s why I ask if there are any photos of this room.
I want it to be real so bad. And there were references to Trump blowing bubba in the emails.
If you Google if it’s real or not the primary criticism of it not being real is that it’s origin can’t be verified. No one knows where it came from.
To me, I would be more sure it was real if there was additional evidence. Until then, I’m just going to have to hope. But admit it’s probably not.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-photo-trump-kneeling-194000609.html
However some of the “reasons” it’s concluded as fake in this are not strong arguments.
The time stamp would depend on the date set in the camera which could easily be wrong. A lot of people never set those.
The odd angles are actually more indicating it’s not AI.
Like the tiny sliver of Clinton’s pants (left leg) close to Trump body.
The photo was taken with a flash in low lighting which would remove a lot of shadows.
The pattern on the carpet is not sharp enough to determine if it’s consistent or not.
Furthermore this “style” of photo is not common in AI. Infact Ive never seen it. It looks like an old film or digital camera with flash on in low lighting. Which is why the aperture is wide open and it has a shallow depth of field.
All proper hands, fingers, and feet are positioned properly in the appropriate number.
If it’s fake. It’s photo manipulation.
No reference photos have been found though that could have been used.
These may also turn up in Epstein files. Which would just cause more questions rather than give answers.
okay, you keep being a piece of shit, but be a piece of shit on my block list.
I think you’re in the wrong here calling them a piece of shit for giving you a detailed answer.
Probably ai generated answer
That’s kinda what I was thinking more so someone put there too downplay any actual thought about ai images that may come out in the future vs the real ones
Its hard to argue with ai slop.
Idk if this is a bot or just some guy using ChatGPT manually, but I’d bet a few sats that’s an ai response.
user is openly supporting pedophiles and criminals by spreading misinformation.
user is a huge piece of shit for openly supporting pedophiles and spreading misinformation.
I don’t see the problem here.
Where are they supporting them?
Was user meant to be auto filled with their name?
Did the prompt not work right?
when you share content to the public with little to no context it will be misconstrued and reshared as “evidence”.
what happens when there is a bunch of falsified or unverifiable “evidence” about a particular crime? all evidence comes into question.
why would that happen? because the defense will always attempt to discredit the claims against them and weaken the actual evidence.
if this miraculously goes to trial, the first argument the defense attorney will make is, “how can any of this ‘evidence’ be trusted if there’s so much of it that can easily be faked by the general public? how can we be assured that the accused isn’t being targeted by their political opponents and slandered?”
so, by posting and refusing to provide context of the joke and refusing to remove the fake image, they are supporting pedophiles and spreading misinformation.
edit: downvote all you want, you know I’m right.