• Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    If you can’t tell the difference between an e bike and an e motorcycle then you shouldn’t be legislating

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      How should one distinguish them? Pedals are the obvious way, but they don’t have anything to do with safety. A bike could have pedals and go 200 km/h.

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 days ago

          A motor. Which is what ebikes have. The difference between a 20km/h ebike and a 200km/h ebike is the strength of the motor.

          If you don’t cap the strength of the motor to be classified as an “ebike”, one could build an electric motorcycle that goes 200km/h and call it an ebike.

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            That’s exactly what i’m talking about.

            We’re facing similar kneejerk laws down here and there is a massive world of difference between a 250-500w ebike and a multi kilowatt emote / dirt bike. However, legislators are acting like a goddamn 250w pedelec with an assist cutout at 30kph is the same as an illegally imported kilowatt emote some dipshit 17 year old ploughs into the back of a parked car at 60kph

            • Zak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 days ago

              I think we probably agree on the fundamentals here: it’s the power and speed that should be a regulatory distinction.

              That’s not e-bike versus e-motorcycle exactly. It doesn’t matter what the form factor or control mechanism is. If it’s fast and powerful, you can’t ride it on bike paths and need a driver’s license to take it on the road.