• zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    You don’t need tone for sarcasm, because it can be inferred from context. Check out British (“dry”) sarcasm.

    Announcing your sarcasm is like explaining your joke. If you need to do it, you’ve failed, and it falls flat. At that point, it’s better to just not be sarcastic in the first place.

    • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      You don’t need tone for sarcasm, because it can be inferred from context. Check out British (“dry”) sarcasm.

      you’re being sarcastic here, right? /s

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      If you want to act like a dumbass even ironically, you don’t get to be mad at people treating you like a dumbass

    • Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      There can be vast differences in reading comprehension and contextual tone recognition.

      As an easy example think of the many degrees of neurodivergency.

      Secondly, British sarcasm and indeed a lot of British communication in general comes from the intention to be deliberately vague, so as to bake plausible deniability in to the responses given.

      It can be inferred, but it’s not a guarantee.

      That being said this guy seems to just be a prick trying to walk back something that blew up in his face.

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m quite familiar. And in plain text it’s often lost on those that would benefit from understanding it. In some contexts it doesn’t matter. In others it does. Sometimes clarity is more important than whether or not it falls flat.