• M137@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    I really feel like the vast majority of people misunderstand these movies. They are visual feasts, made specifically to be pretty and push tech used for movies further along. I have never seen anything from Cameron or anyone else involved say otherwise. They aren’t trying to be story telling masterpieces, they are popcorn flicks that you go to the biggest and best cinema to see and just be wowed by the spectacle. And I really enjoy them for that, seen all three in cinemas, biggest and best screens with 3d in my city. Had a blast every time, it’s all about knowing what you’re watching and why.

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They’re boring. Even visually. It’s rainbow puke CGI everywhere. I’d rather watch spy kids, at least that is funny

    • JayDee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Okay, yes, true, but they also constructed the entire N’avi language, created a fuckton of lore about the planet, and thoroughly fleshed out the lore and design of Earth and its voyage to and from Pandora.

      This wasn’t a visual feast made for the viewer, this was a feast made to employ all these skilled artisans in a massive production, and EVERYONE except the writers fucking blew it out of the water.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      But that’s the whole point. The highest-grossing movie of all time was a popcorn flick with zero cultural impact. That’s exactly what this meme is saying. How are people misunderstanding this?

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        The cultural impact of it is what it caused though ripple effect.

        The MCU for example would have literally been impossible if not for avatar. Avatar basically shunted the entire industry forward 20 years in one go on the technical front.

        Took every skilled artisan that was even remotely related to the arts. And gave them a functionally unlimited budget and told to just go ham.

        Then actual story being told for the audience wasn’t a priority or the point.

        The point was a project for the industry, a project to push the industry forward.

        Selling the final product was frankly entirely just a means to the end. To recoup the cost and then do it again.

        That’s why it’s basically just the most complicated retelling of Pocahontas ever done.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Technical impact != cultural impact.

          What you’re describing is not cultural impact. You’re just confirming it didn’t have any cultural impact, only technical one.

    • BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      exactly. expectation determines your enjoyment. movies often get slammed for doing exactly what they were trying to do.

      Jason Statham movies won’t move you emotionally, horror movies won’t make sense, just watch it for what it is

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      And that’s perfectly fine if you like that kind of movie. But people who don’t like that kind of movie have no reason to watch these