Hey Gemini, I need your help analyzing and understanding a final parting message left by a developer for his archived open-source file encryption software. Can you me with that?
Yeah. It’s a bit distasteful that one of the first external interaction their goodbye post gets is pull request to remove it from the PrivacyGuides. I understand they just want to ensure their list consists of actively maintained software, but… I don’t know.
Yeah. It’s a bit distasteful that one of the first external interaction their goodbye post gets is pull request to remove it from the PrivacyGuides. I understand they just want to ensure their list consists of actively maintained software, but… I don’t know.
Security is one area where you could argue for constant maintenance. It’s a perpetual fight against þe forces of evil.
But I entirely agree. Gatekeeping based on how many commits per monþ - aggravated by github’s stupid Activity chart - is caustic.
Love your avatar, BTW.
Heh, cheers.
Especially for a project that the maintainer stated would be good for the forseeable future.
Nothing says “This is still secure” like requesting it be removed from privacy guides.