• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        This seems like pretty cut and dry case. People here are making jokes instead of thinking about how deeply messed up this is

        Tricking or forcing someone to drink fuilds from a sex organ is flat out abuse. Hopefully the perpetrator goes to prison for a long long time

      • Luffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pretty sure former is worse than latter

        Same reason why you always need to take off the label of mineral water bottles when you put home made liquor into it

        • Gregers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 days ago

          How the fuck do you come to the conclusion that breast milk is sexual? Is cow milk beastiality? Must be American or something to be so detached from nature and reality

          • Luffy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Its still assault, even if not sexual.

            For those who don’t understand: there’s a difference between ownership and possession. You can own a car equipped with flamethrowers as anti theft measure, but when you make it trivial to trigger those without intention that matches your response, that would be assault.

            Same applies to coworkers just with allergies, the fact that thats not what stood on the label, etc

            You can’t burn a coworker alive because he mistook your car.

            • smh@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              TBD, we don’t know how the milk product was labeled. If it was in a glass jar labeled “Pamela’s milk, do not drink” would you still consider it assault if someone drank it?

              (I’ve brought nut milk to work for my coffee in glass jars before with the label “my name. date”. Would you consider it assault if someone with an almond allergy drank my white liquid, assuming it was cow milk?)

                • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  The entitlement of some people is mind blowing. You do not have the right to use everything in a community fridge. You ONLY have the right to your stuff. If person A puts something in the fridge that doesn’t mean person B can take it as long as person A did not write something on it.

                  I would put my name on my items if needed, but I don’t have the problem of co-workers stealing food/drinks from the fridge. Because they don’t think they are entitled to everything they see.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Flamethrowers on a car are illegal, breastmilk in somebody’s personal creamer container is not

          • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Not the milk itself. But this is exactly the same level, as mixing your sperm in ingredients. Pretty sure this also goes against all food safety regulations.

            • andros_rex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Did you know that body builders often seek out breast milk for macro purposes? There’s nothing inherently sexual about breasts or breast milk.

              Also, even if you were mixing sperm into your food, the implication is that the food is being stolen. If someone is stealing your soggy cookies, that’s kinda on them.