GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agoWhen Mothers Get Arrested for Mothering. Raising independent kids shouldn’t be this hard.www.theatlantic.comexternal-linkmessage-square74linkfedilinkarrow-up1193
arrow-up1193external-linkWhen Mothers Get Arrested for Mothering. Raising independent kids shouldn’t be this hard.www.theatlantic.comGolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square74linkfedilink
minus-squareryven@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up32·1 month agoI feel like I am in a Monty Python sketch right now. She “contributed to delinquency” because he could have gotten in trouble that he didn’t get into if things had gone entirely differently?
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoYes. The government decided that children that young should be supervised. She failed to provide that supervision. The child coming back safe that time doesn’t count- it’s a dangerous world.
minus-squareryven@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·edit-21 month agoBut they didn’t charge her with endangering him, that’s a different thing. Edit to add: And I suspect they didn’t because he was, self evidently, not in danger. So I remain confused about why this became an entire affair.
minus-squaredermanus@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoBecause prosecutors are elected in the US, they do all kinds of stupid things.
minus-squaredermanus@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 month ago The government decided that children that young should be supervised. And we all know that the government is always just and never gets it wrong.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agodid I say the government was right? the good news here is that, as part of that government by means of voting, you can go and change yours.
minus-squaredermanus@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month ago did I say the government was right? That was heavily implied by what you wrote, yes. the good news here is that, as part of that government by means of voting, you can go and change yours. I live in a well governed country, this case would never get as far as prosecution where I live.
I feel like I am in a Monty Python sketch right now. She “contributed to delinquency” because he could have gotten in trouble that he didn’t get into if things had gone entirely differently?
Yes.
The government decided that children that young should be supervised. She failed to provide that supervision.
The child coming back safe that time doesn’t count- it’s a dangerous world.
But they didn’t charge her with endangering him, that’s a different thing.
Edit to add: And I suspect they didn’t because he was, self evidently, not in danger. So I remain confused about why this became an entire affair.
Because prosecutors are elected in the US, they do all kinds of stupid things.
And we all know that the government is always just and never gets it wrong.
did I say the government was right?
the good news here is that, as part of that government by means of voting, you can go and change yours.
That was heavily implied by what you wrote, yes.
I live in a well governed country, this case would never get as far as prosecution where I live.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod