• itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Truman won’t be the only war criminal that used nuclear bomb. Truman, Trump, there is something about stupid arrogant Americans which name starts with Trum

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think you mean using the bomb saved American lives. Because hundreds of thousands died because of said bombs. And they were overwhelmingly civilians.

      • iza@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        There were other options besides nukes or ground invasion. Yes napalming Tokyo was also horrific, targeting civilians is never okay.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        including all the issues from radiation decades later? Honest question, but things like that often get overlooked. E.g aftermath of 9/11 cleanup has killed more than 9/11.

        • setsubyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It doesn’t really matter if you only add up casualties and extrapolate what a prolonged conventional war would have caused. Conventional raids killed hundreds of thousands of people too and most of it happened in the last 5-6 months of the war. Single raids like the Tokyo firebombing caused close to or maybe above 100k casualties in one night. It’s not difficult to arrive at estimates in the millions for another year of conventional bombing.

          Where the argument fails is that there is no way Japan wouldn’t have surrendered anyway with much of its industry destroyed, half of its urban areas destroyed, the blockades, the USSR entering the war, etc. The atomic bombs sped it up by a few weeks at most.