• Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Keep pushing. There are probably people using VPNs to sign the petition and those will get purged. Either from idiots who don’t know better or AAA studios trying to get people to stop now that it’s reached the goal. This is true for both the UK and EU petitions.

  • exu@feditown.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Awesome! Now let’s get the EU one as well, much closer than before now. (840’000)

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      5 minutes later and it’s 843k, almost 1k signatures per minute, not bad at all!

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        This is fucking bonkers.

        I ran the math a few days ago, before this absolutely blew the fuck up, and I came to:

        We’d need 11k sigs per day until July 31st.

        … We’re now apparently at more than double that and climbing exponentially.

        Ho Lee Shit.

        God DAMN has it been a while since I’ve seen something go actually, truly, organically viral.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I’m just worried some of them are botted, especially now that we’re less than 100k away from 1m.

  • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    The EU page started 404ing for me right when it should have hit 1 mil; are we being trolled?

    Edit: nvm worked from desktop. Maybe just hug of death.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      It is still getting hugged, I guess people are rushing to add their names now that it is a won battle.
      Edit: managed to load at 999,614.

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Didn’t it already reach the threshold last year and the government (or the civil servant in charge of rejecting every petition) closed it saying that current consumer protection laws already apply?

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      They didn’t close it. They provided an answer early. That as they see it, existing trade and consumer law should cover games and they don’t plan on carving out extra legislation for it but they will “keep an eye on it”.

      Now it is over 100k, it doesn’t actually mean anything more than they “might” debate it in parliament.

      Now, don’t get me wrong. I signed the petition, and I think they SHOULD look into it. But, my old cynical bones tell me that even if they do have a debate in parliament. It will be at a time when there will be 5 MPs in there, who will have nothing to say on the matter and it will be swept under the rug with a further canned statement drawn up by some civil servant in whitehall talking about consumer law just like the statement before.

      Most western governments are on the side of industry, and that includes game developers. I cannot imagine they care about this subject and will do the bare minimum lip service to move past it.

      I hope I’m wrong.

      I do have a bit more hope for the European parliament. Just a little. They do seem to be a bit more pro-consumer. That is the one that matters most IMO.

    • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      My understanding is that they misunderstood the petition, so this new one is rephrased in an attempt to avoid another misinterpretation

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Politicians seem very good at misunderstanding things when it suits them.

  • Hobo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Both are past 100k now! I want to issue a special “fuck you” to all the idiot streamers that tried to kill SKG. And of course a special “go fuck yourself” to PirateSoftware and Asmongold for being fuckwit right wing tools for corporations. You have a special place in my heart as illiterate lapdogs to shitty corporations and right wing shills.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I know about PirateDouchebag, but I am not aware of Asmongold’s issue.

      I apologize but, let’s say that I’ve living under a rock

    • lowleekun@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Asmonpoop is a moronic bum and people went from “this weirdo is strangely entertaining” to " let me hear what my moronic hobo-idol has to say about this".

      It is a little bit like how people supported Drumpf as a joke first.

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Still in disbelief people think SKG is going to work. The premise fucking genocides the MMORPG genre. You kill games by implementing this horrible understanding of how games work.

          I have never seen more people support games who have no fucking idea how games work and it’s the most frustrating shit ever. Pirate Software is right. It’s not even a debate.

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            It doesn’t.

            It just requires that you provide a verson people can host themselves if you take your game offline.

            • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              And if a company refuses? They’re dead anyway. This is not well thought out and PS called it out. You have no actionable solution but are calling for one to just appear.

  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I can’t wait for this to effectively do nothing oe alternatively kill games that have an online only capability that refuse to devote work to force a single player model/release their netcode.

    This is the stupidest, well intentioned movement I’ve seen in awhile and the fervor behind it is a waste. You know what you want but refuse to understand why it can’t happen. You chase the past not realizing you can never go back.

    This is most republican shit I’ve ever seen. “Make games great again!” Jesus.

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      No need to be so salty. Maybe instead just read what skg really is about because you obviously have misunderstood it completely.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        People are sitting on PS for giving a completely correct take. I’ve read SKG and even listened to what the petition owners have said. I’ve stayed in the loop which is why it’s so frustrating to watch people with noble intentions cannibalize people for telling you it’s not only misguided but impossible.

        Legislation will not compel a dying company to release code that will let any random person breathe life back into it on their own whim. Period.

        • Asetru@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Legislation will not compel a dying company to release code

          Well I guess then it’s a good thing that the petition doesn’t demand that.

          • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Upon reading the UK version over again you’re right - it’s even worse. It states that companies no longer be allowed to ‘disable’ games which they often don’t do. They just stop maintaining them until the infrastructure for it disappears.

            I expected at the very least gamers would have understood the problem they’re complaining about but I got ahead of myself. The only thing SKG might accomplish legally is to allow third parties to host servers at End of Life but the counter argument to that is cheaters using their own servers.

            None of this is thought out. You’re demanding a solution be created AND implemented. This will go nowhere. Pirate Software was right and it’s stunning.

            • Asetru@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Upon reading the UK version over again you’re right

              :)

              it’s even worse.

              sigh

              Why?

              It states that companies no longer be allowed to ‘disable’ games which they often don’t do. They just stop maintaining them until the infrastructure for it disappears.

              You’re close. Maybe read it again. Or something. I don’t know.

              • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                Maybe instead of being the condescending dickhead you and yours project onto Pirate Software, you could instead point out specifics since you’re advocating for it. I’m confident you can’t though since I’m sure you haven’t read shit, just listened to people slobber all over it.

                • Asetru@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Maybe we wouldn’t have to be such condescending dickheads if you cared to not make up stuff.

                  the initiative seeks to prevent the remote disabling of videogames by the publishers, before providing reasonable means to continue functioning of said videogames without the involvement from the side of the publisher.

                  That’s the core idea. Publishers should just make sure that after they milked their product it can somehow be run without their interference.

                  That doesn’t require sources. In fact, this doesn’t even state any method that is preferred. Could they release sources? Sure. They could also release server binaries. They could also patch out the connection to their servers and only leave people with local multiplayer mode or something. They could do whatever. The initiative doesn’t care.

                  The practice of licensing a product indefinitely but then just disabling it remotely is hostile to consumers. If they really, really want to keep their business model, they should sell licenses that are limited to a certain timeframe right from the start. Selling perpetual licenses and then disabling them without leaving consumers with any means to still access what they paid for shouldn’t be legal and probably isn’t.

                  Also this right here:

                  The initiative does not seek to acquire ownership of said videogames, associated intellectual rights or monetization rights, neither does it expect the publisher to provide resources for the said videogame once they discontinue it while leaving it in a reasonably functional (playable) state.

                  Nobody wants your ip. Just don’t break stuff you sold.