Notices of rising health insurance premiums are landing in voters’ mailboxes and sending some to town halls to vent their frustration.
Notices of rising health insurance premiums are landing in voters’ mailboxes and sending some to town halls to vent their frustration.
I don’t disagree with that, but that doesn’t mean they voted for him. Believe me, I am more upset than you are, Aussie, But let’s not try and say 2/3 of the people cast to vote for him… which is explicitly what you said
I’d say apathy should be interpreted as a vote for the status quo (incumbent) but it’s flatly wrong to call it a vote at all.
It’s a choice. You to vote or not vote but at the end of the day, if you don’t vote then you should be happy with result. If you aren’t happy then you missed your chance. Effectively your apathy was a vote for the winner, which is my point. (My use of you and your is rhetorical not personal)
But there was no incumbant