After teasing a plan by President Donald Trump to extend Affordable Care Act premium subsidies—currently on track to end within weeks—the White House has indefinitely delayed the announcement under pressure from congressional Republicans, MS NOW reported on Monday.

The last-minute change of plan signals the GOP’s priorities: the party has fought to cut or repeal the ACA since it entered law in 2010, and was uncompromising in opposing the subsidies during the record-breaking government shutdown that ended earlier in November.

The last thing Republican elected officials want to see, the Center for American Progress’ Bobby Kagan posted on social media Monday, is a deal that protects ACA subsidies.

“That’s why they didn’t extend them in OBBBA, and that’s why they kept calling them a ‘December problem’ even though open enrollment began on November 1,” Kagan, the group’s senior director for federal budget policy, wrote.

  • 3abas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    You think those insurance companies got paid and nobody got treated? Because stats out there show tens of millions of people gained coverage who had non before because of that bill.

    Do you think having insurance is the same as receiving medical care?

    You people always claim it’s romneycare but then you sit there and spout Republican talking points, talk about dissonance.

    What republican talking points did I spout? I want true socialized healthcare without a private for profit company in the middle, no, I don’t think the ACA is good enough.

    But like I said, it relieves enough pain that it keeps people from revolting.

    There was always going to be somebody getting paid

    Now there’s a republican talking point! The doctors should get paid, by the state. The leaches in the health insurance industry shouldn’t, and the assertion that they were “always going to get paid” is peak capitalism.

      • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Maybe learn to read a bit, because it’s a matter of definition not of ‘data’. Lmao

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        My and many others’ lived experience tells us otherwise.

        Where is this data you have? That says people actually use insurance and can afford the deductables?

          • 3abas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            What you don’t cite, what you claimed and what I asked you to cite, is how many people don’t skip going to the doctor because of the ACA.

            Not zero, no doubt, that’s my point; it provides enough relief to stifle revolution. No where near 100%, which is what socialized healthcare providers.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            All that is bullshit propaganda. No matter what your studies show, the true Bottom Line is that the average lifespan of Americans is about 4 years LESS than other nations, placing us 26th in the world, and the primary reason is a lack of proper health care.

            Our health care system is among the worst in the world, with the ONLY objective being to generate massive, annually- increasing profits. Health care outcomes are simply a result of profit creation, and the success of those outcomes are secondary to profits. In other words, positive outcomes are subordinate to additional profits.

            No matter what your studies say, they don’t change the fact that our health care system sucks, by anyone’s standards.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you hadn’t lost the debate before this, you just did. Any credibility you had, just evaporated.

        People want real health care, not some financial profit scheme that vaguely resembles it, so the government and the industry can say “We gave you health care. It’s expensive, and it doesn’t work very well, but it’s all you’re going to get, so stop whining.”