What should be illegal here is the kind of misinformation, if you permit some ads and allow others, you’re an advertising agency and should be upfront about it. If your whole business model is “I hide ads” but you only hide those ads that didn’t pay you, that’s false advertisement.
Therapy is not about talking to people, it’s about helping you be best version of yourself. About helping you help yourself. Instead of continue doing whatever you think you’re doing, with isolation and self harm and constant loathing.
Oh, as not great as they are, they aren’t even close to being as bad as US.
And that’s only one of the many reasons technocompanies should stay in their lane, and shouldn’t be asked to be involved in policy decisions.
That’s… Did you actually read my comment? What people? More than whom?
My argument that in wast majority of cases where progressive runs against conservative, progressive wins. And your rebuttal is to list two people who practically weren’t in that situation, one who did and lost, one who did and win, and etc.
Do you think 4 people are a lot? Do you think a person from a city council is a good example of that wast amount of progressive voters showing an mass? Do you think a progressive candidate losing popular vote in primaries twice in a row is a good example of this abundance of progressive voters you’re trying to convey?
Sanders lost both presidential primaries he was in. AOC is a member of House of Representatives. Sawant is on a city council. Mamdani is the only example in recent history of a progressive candidate beating a conservative candidate in direct primaries. I struggle to think of someone else from your “etc” list who also did that. Maybe there is someone. In any scenario, the list is very short.
openly screwed him over
“The sun was in my eyes” is also a good excuse. In any regard, he didn’t get the votes. The DNC was also in his eyes, but he didn’t get the votes, that’s what is important here. If he did, if he would get more votes than other candidates, the situation might be different, and the excuse that DNC didn’t go with him even though he’s more popular might hold the water, but that’s not what happened. What happened is he got less votes than other candidates.
If you voted for Sanders at least as much as NY democrats voted for Mamdani (which is not that much actually, he barely got 10% more votes than the criminal he was against), the DNC would not be able to stop him, but you didn’t, so they didn’t even have to.
It’s a bit hard to find out where it actually originated from and who’s behind it. Judjing by their social media handlers, it’s a marketing agency Hello Makeda. Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t trust marketing agencies to be good judges on geographical projects.
I mean, yeah. People who develop technologies don’t change the systems, and it’s very, very wrong if we ask them to. If you rely on technology company to come up with the system, hyperloop happens. Don’t let another hyperloop happen, don’t come to technology company for the change of the system.
That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying that there are conservative democrats who prefer more conservative democrats over progressive anyone, and there are conservative republicans who don’t want to vote for Trump but wouldn’t vote for any progressives either. The work that demonstrates that is every single democratic primaries, and all the conservative ones.
Also, I am explicitly not advocating for moving to the right, if you need me to spell it out. I don’t think it’s a good decision morally, and I don’t think it’s a good decision politically.
What I’m advocating for, is for progressives to participate in democracy, and not wait for democracy to happen to them. Conservatives vote more than progressives. Democratic party consistently interprets it as a call to move to the right, that’s how democracy works. That’s bad. The only way to fix that is to outvote conservatives.
who do you think they will fire?
10 to 20 percent of the workforce, so the CEO still can get a bonus.
They do, demonstrably. Conservatives from conservative party, conservatives from democratic party, all of them do.
Nah, they don’t. They sometimes pretend they do, but they don’t. They sit around, waiting for magical leftist candidates to appear from thin air, but they never vote for them locally, they never vote for them in primaries, so they never had a chance to not vote for them in generals.
Hell, Bernie Sanders lost popular vote in primaries twice, once to pokemon-go-to-the-polls corporate lady, and once for nothing-will-fundamentally-change old guy.
Leftist in america either don’t exist an mass, or don’t vote, or have no idea how political process in their country works, and I let you decide what is worse.
It demonstrably does. Voting Americans are deeply conservative. Conservative Americans are voting.
They don’t feed diseased animals to the tigers
No they aren’t. With enough setup and very unique and expensive equipment, you can pour shitty concrete walls that will be way more expensive and worse than if you did it normally. That will give you 20% of the house, at best. 20% of not very good of a house.
They are on it just as much as they were on progressive issues very little time ago. Corpos don’t have believes, they do what they think will bring them more money now
Lot of the bible is described as the only moral person in the whole city (two cities actually), the only one deserving to live. If that’s not the definition of being paragon of morality, I don’t know what is.
in getting everything worse, including the single issue you think you care about.
You helped the worst of them be elected thus making genocide worse.
Which ones are those? I struggle to come up with something that US is doing better than the UK. The whole freedom of speech issue might be the one where at least it’s not that obvious, but I would argue UK is just more upfront about it, and even though more topics are explicitly forbidden in the UK, you wouldn’t be dissapeared from the streets by an unmarked van about it, so I would say it’s still better.